Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[CALL TO ORDER]

[00:00:02]

OKAY. ALL RIGHT.

OKAY. WE'LL KIND OF START OVER.

WELCOME RESIDENTS, NEIGHBORS AND GUESTS.

CAN YOU HEAR ME IN THE AUDIENCE? SO APPARENTLY, FOR RECORDING PURPOSES, I'M BEING HEARD.

BUT FOR YOU, THERE'S NO AUDIO HERE, SO I'LL TRY TO SPEAK LOUDLY ENOUGH TO BE HEARD.

BEFORE WE OPEN THE MEETING, I'D LIKE TO START WITH AN INVOCATION AND PLEDGE.

COMMISSIONER WATERS.

YEAH. THEREFORE, WE THANK YOU FOR THIS DAY OF LIFE AND GIVEN US.

WE ARE SO BLESSED TO LIVE.

AFRAID IT WILL LEAD US AND GUIDE US IN THESE TOPICS AND THESE QUESTIONS OUT OF.

YOU LOST YOUR MONEY FOR THIS? I DON'T. PRAY THAT HE WILL MAKE GOOD DECISIONS.

THAT AFFECTS EVERY SINGLE INSTANCE OF DOUBT.

OBVIOUSLY HE OUR DECISIONS.

NOW PRAY FOR OUR COUNTRY RIGHT NOW.

A CRITICAL TIME FOR OUR COUNTRY.

PRAY FOR YOU TO HAVE AND TO HAVE.

YEAH. I MEAN.

STANDS ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.

THANK YOU, SIR.

LIDIJA, ARE YOU READY TO DO A ROLL CALL? YES. OKAY. COMMISSIONER.

PRESENT. COMMISSIONER.

BOLE. PRESENT.

COMMISSIONER. KELLY.

COMMISSIONER. RING.

PRESENT. COMMISSIONER.

WATERS. PRESENT.

MAYOR. FORD.

HERE. THANK YOU LADAYJA.

OKAY, WE'LL JUMP RIGHT INTO THE, THE AGENDA ITEM NUMBER ONE IS APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES.

[1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES]

WE'LL START WITH THE APPROVING THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 23RD, 2023 AND JANUARY 22ND, 2024. DO WE HAVE ANY CHANGES OR CORRECTIONS TO THE MINUTES OF EITHER OF THOSE DATES? THAT HEARING NO CHANGES, MINUTES STAND AS SUBMITTED.

AND THEN WE HAVE THE, ITEM ONE B IS APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FROM THE COMMISSION WORKSHOP HELD ON JANUARY 22ND, 2024.

DO WE HAVE ANY, CHANGES OR CORRECTIONS TO THOSE MINUTES? OKAY. HEARING NONE.

THOSE MINUTES WILL ALSO STAND AS SUBMITTED.

NOW WE GET TO ITEM TWO, WHICH IS COURTESY OF THE FLOOR TO VISITORS TODAY.

[2. COURTESY OF FLOOR TO VISITORS]

WE DON'T HAVE SO MANY PEOPLE, SO WE'LL, UTILIZE THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF TIME, WHICH IS FIVE MINUTES.

I WILL NOT GAVEL YOU AT FIVE MINUTES AND ONE SECOND, BUT AT ABOUT FIVE MINUTES AND 15 SECONDS, IF YOU HAVEN'T NOTICED ME, LOOKING AT YOU THEN, THEN I PROBABLY WILL GAVEL AT THAT POINT.

SO, LAYDAYIA, WHO'S OUR FIRST SPEAKER? JOAN HORN.

HI EVERYONE! MY NAME IS JOAN HORN.

I LIVE ON THE MARSH SIDE OF ATLANTIC BEACH.

I GAVE ALL THE COMMISSIONERS TWO HANDOUTS THIS EVENING.

ONE IS MY OFFER TO PURCHASE ZERO MAYPORT ROAD WITH ANOTHER ATTACHMENT, AND ANOTHER IS AN EMAIL THAT I SENT, INVOLVING RIPARIAN RIGHTS.

I WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE 2024 PRIORITY SETTING MEETING CONDUCTED LAST MONDAY NIGHT.

FIRST OF ALL, I WOULD LIKE TO THANK MAYOR FORD.

COMMISSIONERS RING BOLE, KELLY AND WATERS FOR THEIR SUPPORT OF THE MARSH INITIATIVE, WHICH GARNERED THE MOST VOTES THAT NIGHT THANKS TO YOUR VOTES.

SAVING THE MARSH LAND, TREES, PARKS AND HOMES IS ONE OF THE TOP EIGHT PRIORITIES THE CITY WILL BE PURSUING IN 2024.

THIS IS AN AMAZING VOTE OF SUPPORT FOR THE MARSH.

THIS IS AN AMAZING VOTE OF SUPPORT FOR THE ENVIRONMENT.

THANK YOU, MAYOR FORD FOR LETTING THE PEOPLE SPEAK.

THANK YOU TO THE ENTIRE COMMISSION FOR LETTING OUR VOICES BE HEARD AND FOR ALL OF YOUR SUPPORT.

NOW, ON ANOTHER VERY IMPORTANT TOPIC INVOLVING THE MARSH RIPARIAN BUFFERS ON PRIVATE LAND.

THE FOLLOWING IS AN EXCERPT FROM AN EMAIL I SENT ON JANUARY 30TH, 2024 TO AMANDA ASKEW AND JASON GABRIEL, CITY ATTORNEY.

THE CITY IS SUGGESTING AN ORDINANCE TO ENFORCE A RIPARIAN BUFFER AT THE ICW ON PRIVATE LANDS.

THESE LANDS WERE PURCHASED WITH SURVEYS IDENTIFYING LAND BOUNDARIES AND CAME WITH TITLE INSURANCE.

INSURING THE USE OF LAND AS DESCRIBED AT THE TIME OF ACQUISITION.

IS IT LEGAL FOR A CITY TO IMPOSE RIPARIAN BUFFERS OF 25 TO 50FT, WHICH ARE POLICED BY THE CITY ON PRIVATE LAND? IT SEEMS THAT BY RENDERING A PORTION OF THE PROPERTY UNUSABLE, THIS IN EFFECT WOULD CONSTITUTE EMINENT DOMAIN FOR AMANDA AND OTHERS.

EMINENT DOMAIN IS EXPLAINED BY CORNELL LAW SCHOOL BELOW.

[00:05:03]

EMINENT DOMAIN REFERS TO THE POWER OF THE GOVERNMENT TO TAKE PRIVATE PROPERTY AND CONVERT IT INTO PUBLIC USE, REFERRED TO AS A TAKING, THE FIFTH AMENDMENT PROVIDES THAT THE GOVERNMENT MAY ONLY EXERCISE ITS POWER IF THEY PROVIDE JUST COMPENSATION TO THE PROPERTY OWNERS.

A TAKING MAY BE THE ACTUAL SEIZURE OF PROPERTY BY THE GOVERNMENT, OR THE TAKING MAY BE IN THE FORM OF A REGULATORY TAKING, WHICH OCCURS WHEN THE GOVERNMENT RESTRICTS A PERSON'S USE OF THEIR PROPERTY TO THE POINT OF IT CONSTITUTING A TAKING. THE FIFTH AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION MANDATES THAT IF THE GOVERNMENT TAKES PRIVATE PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC USE, THE GOVERNMENT MUST PROVIDE JUST COMPENSATION. THE US SUPREME COURT CLARIFIED THAT WHEN THE GOVERNMENT ENGAGES IN A TAKING AND IMPLEMENTS A PERMANENT PHYSICAL OCCUPATION OF THE PROPERTY, IT MUST PROVIDE THE PROPERTY OWNER WITH JUST COMPENSATION, EVEN IF THE AREA IS SMALL AND THE GOVERNMENT'S USE DOES NOT GREATLY AFFECT THE OWNER'S ECONOMIC INTEREST.

THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH IS TRYING TO CONDUCT A TAKING OF HOMEOWNER'S LAND THROUGH AN ORDINANCE.

IS THAT EVEN LEGAL? I THOUGHT THERE WERE VERY SPECIFIC STEPS A CITY HAD TO TAKE TO IMPLEMENT EMINENT DOMAIN, SUCH AS PUBLIC HEARINGS, FULL CITY MAILINGS, INDIVIDUAL LAND APPRAISALS, AND MANDATED TIME FRAMES FOR THE PROCESS TO UNFOLD.

THIS PLAN INCLUDES NONE OF THAT.

IF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH ATTEMPTS TO FORCE RIPARIAN BUFFERS ON HOMEOWNERS, THEY WILL NEED TO PROVIDE JUST COMPENSATION FOR DOING SO.

THE CITY COMMISSION MUST BE APPRIZED OF THIS FACT BEFORE THEY VOTE ON THIS ISSUE.

THEY MUST UNDERSTAND THE POTENTIAL FINANCIAL AND LEGAL LIABILITY OF ENFORCING SUCH RULING.

NOW A CASE STUDY MY HOUSE.

IN THE LAST 15 YEARS I HAVE SEEN THE TRIBUTARY BESIDE MY HOME GO FROM BEING TEN FEET AWAY FROM MY LAND TO BEING RIGHT UP ON MY FENCE LINE.

IF THE CITY IMPOSES A RIPARIAN BUFFER OF 25FT, THEY TAKE HALF MY LAND, HALF MY YARD, AND HALF MY HOUSE.

IF THE CITY IMPOSES A RIPARIAN BUFFER OF 50FT, THEY TAKE ALL MY LAND, ALL MY YARD, AND ALL MY HOUSE.

SO, FELLOW CITIZENS, THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH IS A DEMOCRACY.

THIS IS THE LAND OF THE FREE AND THE HOME OF THE BRAVE.

THE CITIZENS OF THE MARSH WILL NOT STAND FOR A RIPARIAN BORDER, WHICH IS BUFFER, WHICH IS EFFECTIVELY TAKING OF OUR LAND.

NEITHER WOULD YOU.

AND WE WILL BRING A LAWSUIT AGAINST THE CITY IF ANY SUCH EFFORT IS ATTEMPTED.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MISS WARREN.

NEXT SPEAKER.

LENNY JEVIC. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR FORD.

COMMISSIONERS AND STAFF.

MY NAME IS LENNY JEVIC.

I LIVE AT 239 SEMINOLE ROAD.

I'M HERE TO ASK FOR SOMETHING TO BE DONE AT OUR TOWN CENTER.

I HAVE NOTICED ON MY DAILY WALKS, ONE OF OUR LOCAL TRANS SEEMS TO HAVE TAKEN UP RESIDENCY ONCE AGAIN IN THE TOWN CENTER, PARTICULARLY ON THE BENCH IN FRONT OF RAGTIME.

HE IS OFTEN ASLEEP ON HIS BIKE WITH ATTACHED TRAILER, SLEEPING BAG, PILLOW AND WHAT SEEMS TO BE ALL HIS BELONGINGS TAKING UP A GOOD PORTION OF THE SIDEWALK.

IF YOU HAVE VISITED THE TOWN CENTER, I KNOW YOU OBSERVED HAVE OBSERVED THE SAME.

I WORK FOR ATLANTIC BEACH FOR 19 YEARS AND HELPED MANY HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS.

THERE ARE NUMEROUS RESOURCES AVAILABLE FOR THEM IF THEY WANT THEM.

MANY OF THESE INDIVIDUALS CHANGE THEIR LIVES AROUND.

HOWEVER, THERE ARE THOSE THAT STILL REFUSE HELP.

I HOPE SOMETHING CAN GET DONE.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR. JOE. JANE BOHANON.

OKAY. MY NAME IS JANE BOHANON.

BENNETT. BOHANON.

BUT YOU KNOW I'M BORN AND RAISED HERE.

MISS JULIETTE ADAMS WAS MY NEIGHBOR 60 YEARS AGO.

ISN'T THAT GREAT? IT'S BEEN A LONG TIME AND I'VE ENDED UP OVER THERE, HELP ASSISTING HER WITH CERTAIN THINGS AROUND THE HOUSE AND HELPING HER OUT.

AND SHE CAN OUT DO ME SOMETIMES.

WELL, THE REASON I'M HERE TONIGHT IS BECAUSE THEY TRY TO PUT A LITTLE.

CORK BARK DRIVEWAY OVER BY HER KITCHEN DOOR, HER BACK DOOR.

AND WE GOT A LETTER FROM THE CODE ENFORCEMENT SAYING THAT, YOU KNOW, AND ANYWAY, I DIDN'T KNOW WHY THEY WANT TO CHARGE US $150 FOR A PERMIT AND $100 FOR THE CODE ENFORCEMENT THEY WANT TO SURVEY, SHE SAYS.

I HAVEN'T SEEN A SURVEY ON THIS PROPERTY AND I DON'T KNOW HOW MANY YEARS.

SO THAT'S ANOTHER $500 JUST FOR A LITTLE BARK.

NON-POROUS. HOW YOU SAY IT? POROUS DRIVEWAY.

AND I DIDN'T KNOW IF THERE WAS SOMETHING Y'ALL COULD SUGGEST TO HELP US KEEP THIS LITTLE BARK DRIVEWAY.

AND THAT'S ALL. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU, MISS BOHANNON.

THERE IS ANOTHER NAME ON THIS SAME SPEAKER FORM.

OKAY, JULIET A [INAUDIBLE] SO WE.

BUT THE NAME IS JULIET.

[00:10:03]

YES. OH, IT'S JULIE.

MISS JULIE. BUT SHE'S NOT SPEAKING, OKAY? THAT'S ALL. OKAY.

SHE IS SPEAKING. I GOT A NOTICE THAT I WAS WE DID IT WRONG.

AND SO THE MAN WHO DID IT WAS NOT HERE.

HE WON'T BE HERE FOR A WHILE.

SO I AM 89 YEARS OLD.

I WENT OUT AND MOVED ALL THE STUFF THAT THEY I THOUGHT WAS THE PROBLEM, AND I THEN I GOT A NOTICE THAT IT ON A SECOND NOTICE I GOT ONE ON FRIDAY AND THEN I GOT ANOTHER ONE ON MONDAY WHEN I COULDN'T TALK TO ANYBODY ON THE WEEKEND.

AND THEN, I CAME OVER HERE, I TALKED, I TRIED TO TALK TO HER HERE, AND THEY SAID, NO, SHE'S OUT TO LUNCH.

I CAME, I WENT HOME, AND I SAID I'D BE HOME IN AN HOUR.

AND THEY SAID, WELL, SHE THAT'S WHEN SHE'LL BE COMING BACK.

AND THEN I CALLED AGAIN AND SHE DIDN'T ANSWER.

AND WE CALLED THREE TIMES AND SHE SAID SHE WAS NOT AVAILABLE.

AND HOW CAN YOU GIVE ME FIVE DAYS AND NOT BE THERE TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT? I JUST WANTED SOMEBODY TO COME AND SEE IF I HAD DONE ENOUGH.

IT WAS HARD ENOUGH MOVING ALL THAT PINE BARK BY MYSELF AT MY AGE, JUST TO GET YOU PEOPLE OFF OF MY BACK, THAT I WAS VERY FRUSTRATED.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MISS JULIE.

ANY OTHERS? OKAY.

WE DON'T HAVE ANYBODY ELSE SIGNED IN, BUT IS THERE ANYBODY THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK? OKAY. HEARING NONE.

[3. CITY MANAGER REPORTS]

WE'LL CLOSE COURTESY OF THE FLOOR AND MOVE ON TO ITEM THREE.

CITY MANAGER REPORTS, MR. KILLINGSWORTH. THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. GOOD EVENING COMMISSION.

ITEM THREE A IS OUR 90 DAY CALENDAR.

IF YOU LOOK AT FEBRUARY, MARCH AND APRIL, YOU CAN SEE THAT WE ARE PAST THE HOLIDAY SLUMP, AND PRETTY MUCH EVERY DAY, AND CERTAINLY ALMOST EVERY WEEKEND IS FULL OF SOME ACTIVITY.

OKAY, SO WITH THAT, MR. MAYOR, IF WE COULD JUST GET CONSENSUS ON THE AGENDA.

SURE. COMMISSIONERS, ANY CORRECTIONS THAT YOU NEED TO MAKE FOR THE 90 DAY CALENDAR? I DON'T HAVE ANY. DO YOU HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT OPENING OF THE BEACHES? IS THAT IN APRIL? YEAH, THE LAST SUNDAY.

OKAY. SO SHOULD THAT.

IS THAT THERE? OH IT'S THERE.

OKAY, GOOD, GOOD.

THAT'S IT. THANKS.

SOMEBODY'S WATCHING. THANK YOU.

OKAY, SO DO WE HAVE CONSENSUS TO APPROVE THE 90 DAY CALENDAR? YES. OKAY.

ALL RIGHT.

OKAY. GO AHEAD.

DORA STREET UPDATES.

SO, THE, SELLER TO DORA STREET HAS SENT US A REVISED PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT.

THERE WERE SOME GOING TO PROVISIONS WITHIN IT THAT I WAS UNCOMFORTABLE WITH.

I TALKED WITH JASON GABRIEL.

HE'S GOING TO GIVE US SOME REVISED LANGUAGE, OR THIS PROJECT IS GOING TO COME UP AGAIN TONIGHT BECAUSE THERE'S A QUESTION.

WE'LL WAIT TILL I GET TO THE CIP UPDATE ON THAT.

BUT, WE ARE CONTINUING TO WORK ON DORA STREET.

AND THAT WILL HOW MUCH FURTHER WE CONTINUE WILL DEPEND ON, A QUESTION I ASKED WHEN WE GET TO THE CIP.

101ST WEST STREET, WE HAVE THE APPRAISALS, WE HAVE THE, BUILDING INSPECTION AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL.

SO ONE APPRAISAL WAS 700,000, THE OTHER APPRAISAL WAS 740,000.

OUR OFFER WAS 730.

APPRAISAL. JUSTIFY THE OFFER.

THE, OFFER, THE BUILDING INSPECTION.

THE ROOF HAS A 4 OR 5 YEARS LEFT ON IT.

MECHANICALS, THE SAME THING.

THE BIGGEST COST IS THE DRIVEWAY.

IT'S A CONCRETE DRIVEWAY AND PARKING LOT, AND IT'S ALL GOING UP.

QUITE FRANKLY, I THINK IT'S STILL USABLE FOR A SHORT TERM.

AND IF WE REPLACE IT, THE COST ESTIMATE WAS FOR REPLACING IT WITH A CONCRETE DRIVEWAY.

IF WE WERE TO REPLACE IT.

WHAT WE TALKED ABOUT IS REPLACING IT WITH A ASPHALT DRIVE AISLE AND THEN MAYBE TURF PLOT FOR THE PARKING SPACES SO THAT THE CITY COULD PRACTICE WHAT IT PREACHES.

AND IRONICALLY, IT WOULD ACTUALLY BE CHEAPER THAN PUTTING IN A CONCRETE PARKING LOT.

SO THAT'S WHAT'S GOING ON WITH 100 WEST FIRST STREET.

ZERO MAYPORT ROAD, THE, I THINK WHERE I'M AT RIGHT NOW IN TALKING WITH JASON IS THAT, UNLESS I HEAR OTHERWISE FROM THE COMMISSION, I'M GOING TO REJECT ALL BIDS, AND THEN WE'LL LOOK AT HOW WE WANT TO GO FORWARD.

ONE OF THE CHALLENGES IS ON THE RFP.

WHEN WE PUT IT OUT, WE DID NOT SET A MINIMUM BID.

AND AS I TALKED ABOUT LAST TIME, WE ONLY GOT ONE BID.

AND THAT BID WAS BELOW THE ASSESSED VALUE.

SO WE MAY CONSIDER PUTTING IT BACK OUT TO BID AT A, SOME MINIMUM BID ABOUT WHETHER THAT'S AT THE ASSESSED VALUE OR JUST VALUE.

[00:15:10]

WE'LL SEE. SO UNLESS THERE'S AN OBJECTION TO REJECTING ALL THE BIDS, THAT'S WHAT I'M GOING TO DO.

THE CIP..

MAY I ASK A QUESTION? CAN YOU RESTATE, THE JUST VALUE AND THE ASSESSED VALUE AS YOU RECALL THEM? YEAH. MY RECOLLECTION IS THE APPRAISED VALUE, AND I'M JUST GOING OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD.

I CAN CERTAINLY LOOK IT UP AND GET IT TO YOU, IF THAT'S WHAT YOU WANT.

BUT THE, I BELIEVE THE APPRAISED VALUE WAS LIKE 75,000.

THE JUST VALUE, WHICH IS THE MARKET VALUE.

LESS CLOSING COSTS, ESSENTIALLY.

SO IT'S WHAT A SELLER IN A FAIR MARKET TRANSACTION WOULD ACTUALLY WALK AWAY FROM.

THE TRANSACTION WAS IN THE 60S.

AND THEN THE ASSESSED VALUE WAS ABOUT 11.5 I THINK.

SO, AND THEN THE ONLY BIG WE GOT WAS [INAUDIBLE] OKAY.

THANK YOU. SO, CIP UPDATE.

SO. WHAT I THOUGHT I WOULD START DOING IS, CIPS BASICALLY BUSTED INTO PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS AND PUBLIC UTILITIES PROJECTS.

I'VE CAPTURED THOSE PROJECTS THAT ARE OVER $100,000, AND THEN SOME PROJECTS THAT I KNOW ARE IMPORTANT THAT ARE UNDER $100,000.

AND WHAT I THOUGHT I WOULD DO IS BIFURCATE THEM.

SO ONE COMMISSION MEETING WOULD BE THE PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS.

THE NEXT COMMISSION MEETING WOULD BE PUBLIC UTILITIES PROJECTS, SO THAT I'M NOT CAPITALIZING ON THAT WHOLE MEETING TIME, RUNNING THROUGH A BUNCH OF PROJECTS.

SO TONIGHT WE'LL BE PUBLIC WORKS.

I HAVE ABOUT 15 PROJECTS HERE.

I'LL RUN THROUGH THEM VERY QUICKLY.

AND THEN IF THERE'S QUESTIONS, I'LL CERTAINLY ENTERTAIN THOSE.

AND WE HAVE, SCOTT HERE FROM PUBLIC WORKS.

SO IF THERE'S A QUESTION, WE CAN GET HIM TO SPEAK TO HIM.

SO WE HAVE ABOUT $222,000 IN, DUNE WALKOVER MAINTENANCE.

WE'RE CURRENTLY LOOKING AT, REHABBING PORTIONS OF 18TH STREET AND MAYBE SOME POTENTIAL ENHANCEMENTS THERE.

WE'RE CURRENTLY WAITING ON SOME PRICING FROM THAT.

WE'VE, COME UP WITH A SKETCH PLAN, AND WE'RE WAITING ON PRICING FROM A VENDOR TO GET US A SENSE OF HOW MUCH THAT WOULD COST.

THE SPLASH PAD OVER IN, DONNER PARK.

THAT'S $607,500 THAT'S CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND IS ESTIMATED TO BE COMPLETED MARCH, APRIL OF THIS YEAR.

THE PICKLEBALL COURT. ALSO AT DONNER, IS $90,000.

THE CONTRACT FOR THAT HAS BEEN AWARDED.

WE'VE HAD OUR PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING, THE LIGHT POLES HAVE BEEN MOVED AND THE FENCING IS BEING TAKEN DOWN AS WE'RE SPEAKING, NOT AS WE'RE SPEAKING, BUT, THIS WEEK, I BELIEVE.

OVER ON DUTTON ISLAND, THE NORTH FISHING PIER.

WE HAVE 200,000 SET ASIDE FOR THAT.

WE'VE MET WITH THE CONTRACTOR AND WE'RE WAITING ON PRICES.

THERE WAS AN OPPORTUNITY TO PIGGYBACK EXACTLY.

GO OVER THE CONTRACTOR THERE.

THAT NYLON ROAD DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS WITH 70,000 STAFF AS GRADED PART OF THE ROAD THERE.

AND WE'RE WORKING ON DESIGN IMPROVEMENTS AT THIS POINT TO ALLOW FOR THE, YOU KNOW, THE ONE IT'S A ONE LANE ROAD.

SO WE'RE TRYING TO COME UP WITH A DESIGN WHERE ESSENTIALLY YOU CAN HAVE A PLACE WHERE A CAR CAN PULL OVER AND ALLOW ANOTHER CAR TO PASS, AND THEN CONTINUE ON SO THAT WE CAN PRESERVE THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM THERE.

FIVE YEARS PARK IS A NEW DECKING AND HANDRAILS.

WERE WAITING ON THAT UNTIL WE GET A PRICING ON, THE FISHING PIER.

SO WE HAVE KIND OF A SENSE OF WHAT THINGS ARE GOING TO PRICE SO WE CAN COME UP WITH A DESIGN.

UM STREET MAINTENANCE.

THERE'S $550,000 SET ASIDE FOR REPAVING.

THE CITY HAS AN ASPHALT MANAGEMENT RANKING SYSTEM, WILL RE-RANK THE ROAD SEGMENTS, AND WERE IN THE PROCESS OF GETTING A CONTRACT.

WE'RE HOPING THAT A CONTRACT IN THE NEXT 4 TO 6 WEEKS.

WHEN THAT CONTRACT IS SIGNED, THE NUMBER ONE PROJECT ON THERE IS THE SPEED HUMPS ON MAIN STREET.

YOU MIGHT HAVE NOTICED THAT THE ROUNDABOUT CAME OUT LAST, LAST FRIDAY.

SO THAT IS, PROCEEDING.

AND THEN WE HAVE A $125,000 SET ASIDE FOR SIDEWALK REPAIRS.

THOSE OF HISPANIC HAPPENING AS THEY COME UP.

IT'S NOT A SPECIFIC PROJECT.

THE LEVEE ROAD MULTI USE PATH IS $609,000.

SO WE SENT A NOTICE TO PROCEED FOR MARCH 12TH.

AND UTILITIES THAT ARE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY ARE STILL BEING MOVED, BUT WE EXPECT THE CONTRACT WILL BE ABLE TO START MARCH 12TH.

LIFEGUARD STATION, SO THIS IS A CHALLENGING ONE.

THERE'S APPROXIMATELY 560,000 IN THE BUDGET THAT I BELIEVE WE GOT FROM THE CITY OF JACKSONVILLE.

THE DESIGN BUILD ESTIMATE CAME OUT TO APPROXIMATELY $1.2 MILLION FOR THAT PROJECT.

[00:20:07]

SO THERE'S OBVIOUSLY A BIG SHORTFALL THERE.

I TALKED TO STEVE AND, I'VE LOOKED AT THEIR RENDERINGS AND THE CHALLENGE THAT WE HAVE IS THAT SO THERE'S A DRIVE THROUGH PARKING LOT AND THAT DRIVE THROUGH GARAGE.

THAT DRIVE THROUGH GARAGE HAS THE SHOWER AND CHANGING ROOMS ABOVE IT SO THAT WE CAN MAKE IT ACCESSIBLE BOTH TO OUR FEMALE AND MALE LIFEGUARDS.

YOU KNOW, ONE RESTROOM THERE NOW.

SO. I TALKED ABOUT MAYBE NOT HAVING THE DRIVE THROUGH GARAGE AND SEE IF WE COULD REDUCE THE COST.

THE CHALLENGE WITH THAT IS IF WE MAKE THAT DECISION, THEN THE BATHROOMS WILL BE ON THE GROUND FLOOR.

AND WHAT THAT MEANS IS WE LOSE THE OPPORTUNITY TO EVER HAVE A DRIVE THROUGH GARAGE THERE FOR THE [INAUDIBLE].

AND YOU KNOW, WHEN THE FOUR WHEELER THAT'S THERE.

THE, A CLOSED GARAGE IS FOR THE BACK OF THE BUILDING, BUT IT HOUSES THE ABOVE.

IT HOUSES THE ASSEMBLY AREA, THE TRAINING ROOM AND SO IT'S THE SAME KIND OF THING.

IF WE GOT RID OF THE GARAGE, WE THEN PERMANENTLY LOSE THE ABILITY OF THE SITE'S VERY TIGHT.

SO IN LOOKING AT IT, IN TALKING WITH STEVE, IT SEEMS AS THOUGH OUR CHOICES REALLY THAT IT'S AN IMPORTANT, FACILITY FOR THE BEACH AND FOR THE PROTECTION OF OUR RESIDENTS AT THE BEACH AND FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE LIFEGUARDS THEMSELVES, BECAUSE DURING STORM EVENTS, WE NEED TO PUT THEM UNDER COVER, THAT OUR OPTIONS REALLY COME DOWN TO APPROPRIATING MORE MONEY FROM RESERVES, WHICH IS NEVER MY FIRST CHOICE.

AND YOU'LL SEE THAT TONIGHT ON AT LEAST ONE OTHER ITEM.

AND SO THE OTHER OPTION, AND THIS COMES TO DORA STREET AND TALKING WITH STEVE, HE BELIEVES THAT THE LIFEGUARD STATION IS A MORE IMMINENT NEED AND MORE IMPORTANT.

AND SO I THINK STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION, RATHER THAN GOING TO THE RESERVES AND HITTING THE RESERVES, IS WORKING WITHIN THE EXISTING BUDGET AND MOVING THE MONEY FROM DORA TO THE LIFEGUARD STATION AND GETTING THAT PROJECT STARTED.

THE OTHER CHALLENGES WE'RE TRYING TO PREVENT IS THE COST KEEP ESCALATING, AND WE WANT TO LOCK IN A PERMANENT, NOT TO EXCEED COST SO THAT WE CAN GET THIS DONE. YOU'RE GOING TO SEE ON OTHER PROJECTS HERE THAT THE COST OF COMING OUT.

100% OF MORE THAN WHAT WAS ORIGINALLY BUDGETED.

AND THAT'S NOT UNIQUE TO US.

I'VE TALKED TO CHRIS LEDOUX, THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER FOR THE CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, AND HE'S SEEING THE SAME THING THAT CONSTRUCTION COSTS ARE THAT ARE COMING IN AT 100% ABOVE WHAT THEY ORIGINALLY BUDGETED.

SO IT'S JUST KIND OF WHERE WE ARE IN THE MARKETPLACE.

AND I DON'T KNOW THAT IT'S GOING TO GET ANY BETTER ANYTIME SOON.

SO WE KIND OF LIKE TO LOCK IN, A MAXIMUM PRICE AS WELL AS GET THE PROJECT UNDERWAY.

IF WE WAIT FOR THE NEXT BUDGET YEAR THAT WE MAY NOT GET THE MAXIMUM PRICE AND WE'RE GOING TO MISS A WHOLE SEASON, POTENTIALLY PART OF NEXT SEASON.

SO IF WE CAN GET STARTED THIS YEAR, WE WILL MISS THIS SEASON WITH THE WITH THE BUILDING.

BUT IT WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR THE.

SO THAT'S, THE LIFEGUARD STATION.

THE PUBLIC BUILDINGS REHAB.

IT'S $1.5 MILLION.

IT'S UNDER CONSTRUCTION RIGHT NOW, AND YOU'LL SEE A RESOLUTION LATER ON TO, ADJUST THAT AGAIN.

OUR SOLUTION IS TO WORK WITHIN THE EXISTING BUDGET, AND WE'RE MOVING MONEY AWAY AND INSTALLING, ONE PROJECT, AND WE'LL COME BACK AND ASK FOR MONEY NEXT YEAR AND WORK WITHIN OUR EXISTING BUDGET.

AND THEN, THE EIGHT DAY DOORS, WE HAVE $194,000 BUDGETED FOR THAT AT THE BUILDING MAINTENANCE YARD.

THE GRANTS BEEN APPROVED AND THE DOORS ARE ON ORDER TO SEE IF THOSE WILL GET THOSE INSTALLED.

AQUATIC GARDENS. THAT'S A $2.6 MILLION PROJECT.

WE PUT THAT OUT FOR BID AND WE GOT ZERO BIDS ON IT.

AND WHEN WE TALKED TO THE CONTRACTING COMMUNITY, THE ISSUE IS THAT THERE'S TWO SPECIALIZED PIECES OF WORK IN THERE, AND NOBODY WANTED TO BE.

WE HAD INTEREST IN EACH OF THE INDIVIDUAL, SPECIALIZED PIECES OF WORK, BUT NOBODY INTERESTED IN DOING BOTH PIECES TOGETHER.

SO WE'RE BIFURCATING THE PROJECTS, AND WE'RE GOING TO PUT BOTH PROJECTS OUT TO BID SEPARATELY.

AND WE EXPECT WE WILL GET BIDS THERE.

AND THAT WE EXPECT THE REBID TO TAKE PLACE AT THE END OF FEBRUARY.

THE BOX CULVERT AT, CUTLER'S DRIVE.

IT'S $82,000.

RFQ IS BEING EVALUATED RIGHT NOW, SO WE EXPECT TO BE ABLE TO AWARD THAT SHORTLY.

THE PUBLIC WORKS YARD, IT'S $240,000.

THAT IS SOMETHING THAT WE PLAN ON UTILIZING TO FUND THE REHAB, THE CHANGE ORDERS TO THE REHAB FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING.

[00:25:06]

SO THAT PROJECT, WE WILL BE PUSHING FORWARD TO THE NEXT BUDGET YEAR.

ANNUAL DRAINAGE, DITCH MAINTENANCE.

WORKING ON THE CONTRACT FOR THAT.

TO GO OUT TO BID RIGHT NOW.

GERMAN CREEK DITCH MAINTENANCE.

THOSE BIG BLOCKS ARE COMPLETED AND SO THEY WILL GO OUT.

AND THEN THE SIDING ROAD DRAINAGE, THE RFQ OR THE THOSE ARE BEING EVALUATED RIGHT NOW.

AND THEN THE LAST PROJECT IS A MARY STREET DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT.

THAT'S $371,000 PROJECT.

AND WE'RE WAITING ON THAT AWARD FOR THAT.

WITH THAT, MR. MAYOR, WE'RE TALKING.

OH, YEAH. THAT YOU.

WE'RE UNPACKING A LOT HERE, SO I KNOW COMMISSIONER.

RECEPTION. COMMISSIONER.

RING. I APPRECIATE ALL OF THE UPDATES THOUGH.

I KNOW THAT WAS A LOT. WHAT DID YOU SAY THERE WERE 12 THAT YOU JUST GAVE US? THERE MAY HAVE BEEN. I WROTE DOWN AS MANY AS I COULD, BUT, I DID HAVE A QUESTION.

WHAT DID YOU SAY WAS THE SPLASH PAD WHEN IT WOULD BE DONE? SO THERE WERE 19 ITEMS. THE SPLASH PAD IS, MARCH, APRIL OF 24TH OF 24.

SO IT'S THIS AWESOME.

THAT'S GREAT NEWS. YEAH, WELL, IT MIGHT BE TOO COLD, BUT, AND THEN WITH THE LIFEGUARD STATION.

SO I'M JUST GOING TO RECAP HERE.

YOU'RE SAYING, DORA, EARLIER YOU SAID THAT DORA DRIVE, THERE WAS SOMETHING WITH THE CONTRACT THAT YOU DIDN'T AGREE WITH AND THAT WE'RE GOING TO TABLE IT.

SO THE THERE IS LANGUAGE.

WE THOUGHT THAT WE SAT DOWN WITH THE SELLER AND AGREED TO SOME LANGUAGE VERBAL.

HE SUBMITTED A PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT FOR US TO LOOK AT WHAT WE THOUGHT WE AGREED TO VERBALLY ISN'T EXACTLY WHAT WE SAW ON THE WRITTEN PAGE, SO I TOLD THE SELLER THAT I WOULD RECRAFT IT.

AND IN TERMS OF WHAT WE THOUGHT WE WERE AGREEING TO, AND I ASKED JASON ALSO, ONE OF THE TERMS HAD TO DO WITH ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP.

AND WHEN IT'S DONE AND NOT DONE, HIS FIRM HAS AN ENVIRONMENTAL ATTORNEY.

SO I ASKED THAT HE LOOK AT WHETHER OR NOT THE LANGUAGE WAS SUFFICIENT TO PROTECT THE CITY.

SO WE ARE CONTINUING FORWARD ON THAT PATH.

OKAY. I DON'T KNOW WHAT THIS COMMISSION IS GOING TO CHOOSE TO DO, BUT..

STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THE LIFEGUARD STATION.

WHAT WE'RE RECOMMENDING IS THAT THE LIFEGUARD STATION IS AN IMMINENT NEED, AND IT'S MORE IMPORTANT, IN OUR ESTIMATION.

AND SO WHAT WE'RE RECOMMENDING IS RATHER THAN TAKING MONEY OUT OF THE GENERAL FUND RESERVES, IS USING THE MONEY FOR DORA STREET FOR THE LIFEGUARD STATION SO THAT WE CAN GET A MAXIMUM NOT TO EXCEED PRICE NOW AND GET DID IT GO? AND THEN THE PROPERTY IS STILL AVAILABLE AS WE'RE DOING THE BUDGET NEXT YEAR TO ALLOCATE MONEY FOR THAT.

OKAY. RIGHT. OKAY.

AND THEN IF WE DID DO THAT WITH THE LIFEGUARD STATION AND WE WENT FORWARD WITH THAT, WOULD WE KEEP THE DESIGN THAT, WE INITIALLY HAD THIS TIME LAST YEAR, CORRECT THE DESIGNS? IF I CAN HAVE STEVE COME UP BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW, WHERE ARE WE AT 30%.

YES, SIR. STEVE SWANN, CITY ENGINEER.

WE'RE AT, 30% RIGHT NOW.

WHAT WE DID WAS WE PAID A DESIGN BUILD CONTRACTOR TO PROGRESS THE DESIGN TO A 30% LEVEL AND GIVE US A HARD ESTIMATE OF THE COST, WHICH IS CALLED A GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE.

SO HE DRAFTED THAT UP FOR ME.

WE DON'T HAVE THE FINAL FROM HIM YET.

BUT WHAT WILL HAPPEN IS IF WE GO FORWARD WITH IT, I'LL GET A GUARANTEED MAXIMUM PRICE FROM HIM THAT I'LL PUT IN FRONT OF YOU, AND THAT PRICE WILL NOT CHANGE.

ALL THE CHANGE ORDERS ARE ON HIM.

HE'S TAKEN, HE'S TAKEN THE, THE RISK AT THIS POINT AND NOT THE CITY.

SO AT THAT POINT, THEY'LL FINISH THE DESIGN AND THEN PROCEED INTO CONSTRUCTION.

AND WE DID, REACH OUT TO, ANOTHER CONTRACTOR JUST TO ASK, ARE THESE COSTS THAT WE GOT REASONABLE? AND THE ANSWER WAS, WELL, THERE MIGHT BE SOME AREAS WHERE WE COULD PLAY WITH.

BUT IN GENERAL, YES, THE NUMBERS ARE WHAT WE WOULD PROBABLY CHARGE YOU AS WELL.

WE SAID WE WERE ALLOTTED THIS MONEY THROUGH COJ.

IS THAT THROUGH THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT? I THINK IT WAS A, DIRECT APPROPRIATION FROM, THE CITY.

SO IT WASN'T IT WASN'T MONEY THAT IS PROGRAMMATIC THROUGH [INAUDIBLE] AND IF I MAY, COMMISSIONER.

GO AHEAD. I'M SORRY.

WE DID TALK A LOT.

AND FIRST OF ALL, I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR GOING THROUGH THOSE THINGS BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, THIS IS AN UPDATE THAT WE ALL NEED.

AND I'LL JUST GO DOWN MY LIST.

COMMISSIONER WATERS, COMMISSIONER KELLY KNOWS THIS LIFEGUARD STAND ISSUE HAS BEEN ON THE TABLE FOR THREE AND A HALF YEARS.

AND BY LAW, THE FIRST THING I VOTED ON.

I THINK IT'S CRITICAL TO [INAUDIBLE] CHIEF.

[00:30:02]

THE SAFETY, ETC., ETC..

SO. YES. YEAH.

STRONG PROPONENT OF THAT AND HAVE BEEN FOR THREE YEARS, BUT DISAPPOINTS ME THAT WE HAVE MADE IMPROVEMENTS.

YOU KNOW, I THINK THERE'S A LOT OF REASONS WHY I GET THAT.

BUT ALSO THE DORA STREET, YOU KNOW, WE ALL SAT AND DID OUR, PRIORITIES THE OTHER WEEK AND WE TALKED ABOUT RESILIENCY.

DORA STREET IS NOT HISTORIC STREET.

IT'S RESILIENCE. AND I UNDERSTAND THE FINANCIAL ISSUES.

BUT I ALSO REMEMBER ABOUT A YEAR AGO, A YEAR AND A HALF AGO, WE, WE VOTED ON DORA STREET AND SAID, YOU KNOW WHAT? IF IT IF IT COMES OUT THERE THAT I KNOW THE ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES, ETC., ETC., BUT I SEE DORA STREET AND, YOU KNOW, LET'S TALK TO OUR CITY ENGINEER AS CRITICAL IN OUR RESILIENCY INFRASTRUCTURE.

SO I THINK THAT'S IMPORTANT TOO.

AND I THINK THAT'S ONE OF OUR NUMBER ONE PRIORITIES, I BELIEVE LAST WEEK.

AND I THINK THAT'S ONE OF OUR PRIORITIES FOR THE FIRST THREE YEARS.

SO I PUT THAT FIRE.

THEN, YOU KNOW IT'S A FUNDING ISSUE.

YEAH I UNDERSTAND ABOUT THE RESERVE.

I GET THAT.

AND UNTIL I SEE WHAT 101ST, THE WEST STREET IS GOING TO BE OKAY.

YOU KNOW, IF WE'RE GOING TO REALLY PRIORITIZE THINGS, YOU CAN, WE'VE ALREADY VOTED ON ONE.

WE VOTED ON THE SECOND ONE.

AND SO, I GUESS, YOU KNOW, WHEN WE COME DOWN TO THE, NUTS AND BOLTS OF THAT, I TALKED TO A COUPLE PEOPLE.

YOU KNOW, WE REALLY SHOULD HAVE OUR PRIORITIES RIGHT BEFORE WE DO THE BUDGET BECAUSE WE EXECUTE THE BUDGET.

AND I UNDERSTAND THE THREE MONTHS AND STUFF, AND I KNOW I'M THROWING IT ON HERE, BUT BUT IT ALSO LIKE TO SAY, I DON'T UNDERSTAND MAYBE THE ZERO MAYPORT ROAD OR GOAL THERE IS REALLY TO MAKE SURE THAT PROPERTY IS NOT GO AM I, AM I RIGHT? AND WHY CAN'T THE CITY DONATE THAT OR PUT THAT? YOU KNOW, I GUESS I DON'T UNDERSTAND THE RUSH TO SELL IT IN THAT, YOU PROBABLY CAN FIND A CONSERVATOR OR SOMEBODY THAT'S NOT GOING TO DEVELOP IT AND SAY, YOU KNOW WHAT, THIS LAND FOREVER WILL NOT GO INTO MY [INAUDIBLE] WELL, SO MY RECOMMENDATION TO REJECT ALL BIDS WOULD MAKE THAT POSSIBLE. YEAH, THAT'S WHAT IT DOES.

RIGHT. ALL RIGHT. WHEN YOU SAID IT.

OKAY I DRONED ON ENOUGH.

BUT I YOU KNOW, I THINK THE PRIORITIES WE SET AND WE VOTED ON PREVIOUSLY THAT, YOU KNOW, I THINK WE PRIORITIZED.

SO ENOUGH.

YOU KNOW, I AGREE WITH BRUCE.

THE DORA GETTING JUST KIND OF TRYING TO MAXIMIZE THE, THE CONSULTATION WITH THEM AND WORK THROUGH ANY VERBIAGE, LANGUAGE, WHATEVER, AND JUST AND JUST SEE FOR SURE BECAUSE, YEAH, IT'S IT IS RESILIENCY.

YOU ALREADY HAD SOME PUSHBACK WITH ALMOST HOME.

SO I THINK IT WOULD BE I THINK WOULD BE HELPFUL JUST TO KIND OF MAXIMIZE THAT CONVERSATION.

BUT ALSO I JUST WANT TO THANK YOU FOR DOING ALL THAT BECAUSE IT IT DOES SHOW THE CITIZENS HOW MUCH MONEY THIS IS, HOW BIG THESE PROJECTS ARE.

AND YOU SEE IT EVERY TWO WEEKS, FOUR WEEKS, YOU KIND OF LOSE YOUR SCOPE.

BUT HERE, TO RATTLE OFF LIKE THAT, IT SHOWS WE'VE WE'VE ALL WORKED HARD FOR ALL THESE THINGS FOR A LONG PERIOD OF TIME.

AND THANKS FOR THE UPDATE.

THANKS FOR, THANKS FOR EXPLAINING TO THE CITIZENS AND AND US FOR THE.

OKAY, SO I GUESS I'LL, I'LL COME IN ON A COUPLE THINGS.

FIRST OF ALL, MR. KILLINGSWORTH, CAN YOU STATE AGAIN WHAT IS OUR DELTA ON THE LIFEGUARD STATION BETWEEN BUDGET AND MY BEST GUESS, COST TODAY? WE'RE ABOUT 650 TO 750.

SO THAT'S A FAIR AMOUNT OF MONEY.

SO, I DON'T KNOW WHERE I STAND YET.

ON. I HEARD THAT THIS IS A SAFETY ISSUE, AND I'M NOT SURE I AGREE WITH THAT.

I THINK WE'RE TRYING TO BRING OURSELVES INTO THE 21ST CENTURY, AND ACTUALLY HAVE BATHROOMS FOR WOMEN AND MEN.

THAT'S THAT'S A NICE POSITIVE, BUT I DON'T THINK THAT'S A SAFETY ISSUE.

WE'VE OPERATED OUT OF THE CITY YARD WITH OUR EQUIPMENT FOR DECADES, AND WE'VE DONE IT EFFECTIVELY.

SO, AGAIN, I DON'T THINK THIS IS A SAFETY ISSUE, BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN I DON'T SUPPORT MOVING FORWARD WITH THE LIFEGUARD TOWER.

ONE THING, AND, YOU KNOW, CHIEF HAS DONE I'VE BEEN IN IT.

YOU KNOW, WHEN YOU SAY SAFETY.

YEAH, THE LIGHTNING AND THUNDER, GOT THAT, BUT TO ME THE MOLD IS MORE OF AN ISSUE THERE.

THAT'S RECURRING YEAR AFTER YEAR.

SO I WOULD AGREE.

WE'RE ASKING OUR LIFEGUARDS TO BE IN A PLACE THAT, YOU KNOW, AGAIN, CHIEF IS THE EXPERT HERE, BUT I DO KNOW THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HOW THEY LOOK AT MOLD AND HOW THAT WE BARELY WOULD YOU SAY, EXCUSE ME SQUEAKED BY ON THE LAST COUPLE OF MOLD INSPECTIONS.

OR THAT MAY YOU MIGHT HAVE ASKED.

YOU KNOW, HE KNOWS MORE ABOUT THIS THAN I DO, BUT I'M FAMILIAR WITH THE PROBLEM.

CHIEF GUALILLO.

SO YES, EVERYWHERE WE'VE GONE IN THERE AND TESTED IT, THERE HAVE BEEN MOLD HAS BEEN MOLD REPORTED IT.

THERE'S NO LIFETIME MAXIMUM LEVEL FROM FROM NIOSH OR OSHA FOR LIFE FOR THE MOLD EXPOSURE.

[00:35:02]

THERE ARE PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS THAT WILL TELL YOU WHAT A SAFE LIMIT IS.

WE HAVE BEEN BELOW THE SORRY.

THE DANGEROUS LIMIT IS WE HAVE BEEN BELOW THAT.

THERE WAS ONE INSTANCE WHERE WE HAD BLACK MOLD.

IT WAS A SMALL AMOUNT. IT WAS REMEDIATED.

WE HAVEN'T HAD ANY POSITIVE TESTS FOR BLACK MOLD SINCE THEN, BUT EVERY YEAR WE GO IN, WE TEST BEFORE THE SEASON BEGINS, AND WE DO GET THE REPORT BACK.

AND EVERY SEASON WE GET BACK, IT'S EITHER ASPERGILLUS OR SOME OTHER SORT OF MOLD THAT'S IN THERE.

SO IT DOES EXIST.

I THINK THE THE CONCERN IS, IS THAT AT SOME POINT IN TIME THERE MAY BE A, AN ISSUE WITH THE HEALTH, CONCERN.

WE KNOW THERE'S MOLD IN THERE.

IT'S JUST IT'S AN OPEN BUILDING.

IT'S OPEN TO THE ELEMENTS FOR THE MOST PART.

THE WIND AND THE THE MOISTURE WICKS UP THROUGH THE BUILDING.

IT'S JUST IT'S THE NATURE OF THAT BUILDING IN ITS CURRENT STATE.

SO I THINK IT IS WORTH TALKING ABOUT HOW WE MAKE THAT A MORE HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT FOR THE LIFEGUARDS THAT ARE IN THERE.

THEY ARE PART TIME.

THEY WORK SIX MONTHS OUT OF THE YEAR, BUT THEY ARE AN IMPORTANT PART OF THE CITY STAFF.

THEY ARE OUT THERE EVERY DAY PROVIDING FOR THE SAFETY OF EVERYBODY'S ON THE BEACH.

ONCE YOU GET TO KNOW THEM, YOU REALIZE HOW MUCH WORK THEY DO.

SO I THINK IT'S A WORTHWHILE INVESTMENT.

I THINK THERE IS A CONCERN.

WE TALKED ABOUT HAVING THAT EQUIPMENT THERE FOR AFTER HOURS RESPONSES.

THAT IS A SAFETY ISSUE. I THINK THAT, WE HAD A DROWNING, ABOUT SIX MONTHS AGO OR SO, AND WE HAD 30 LIFEGUARDS COME OUT THAT AFTERNOON.

IT WAS INCREDIBLE. ACTUALLY.

THEY WERE OFF DUTY.

THEY SHOWED UP JUST TO COME HELP.

THEY WERE ABLE TO GET THEIR GEAR OUT THERE, THE THE SURF SKIS AND BOARDS AND THINGS, AND THEY CAME OUT.

SO THEY'RE THERE TO HELP US WHEN WE NEED THEM.

SO IT'S IMPORTANT THAT WE HAVE THEM ACCESSIBLE, OUR EQUIPMENT ACCESSIBLE.

YEAH. AND IF I MAY ASK, THANK YOU FOR THE, THE FACT BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT I'M LOOKING FOR.

WE HAD A DROWNING.

THIS WAS THIS PAST YEAR.

YES, IN 23. SEPTEMBER.

WHAT TIME OF DAY WAS THAT? EARLY AFTERNOON. IT'S STILL DAYLIGHT.

GETTING INTO THE DUSK.

DID THAT PERSON DROWN IN NEPTUNE BEACH? AND THEY COME ASHORE IN ATLANTIC BEACH, OR VICE VERSA.

SO THEY'RE RIGHT ON THE EDGE.

I THINK IT WAS CLOSE TO THE SEA.

OCEAN ONE THERE.

I THINK THERE MAY HAVE BEEN SOME DISCUSSION ABOUT WHERE HE WENT IN THE WATER AT, BUT THERE WAS A SEARCH.

WE LOOKED FOR HIM FOR QUITE A WHILE, I THINK, BEFORE WE FOUND HIM.

I CAN'T REMEMBER EXACTLY WHICH SIDE OF THE LINE IT CAME UP, SO IT'S DISTRESSING ANYTIME YOU HEAR ABOUT A DROWNING, WHETHER IT'S IN OUR CITY OR ADJACENT.

BUT AGAIN, I'M, I DON'T WANT TO NECESSARILY CONNECT THAT TO THE JET SKI AND WHATNOT.

BEING IN A GARAGE OCEAN FRONT TO CHANGE THE OUTCOME BECAUSE I DON'T THINK THEY WOULD HAVE.

HOWEVER, THE REAL QUESTION IS, IN THE PAST 20 YEARS, CAN YOU GIVE US ANY EXAMPLES WHERE WE WERE NOT PREPARED TO SAVE SOMEBODY OR INTERCEDE TO TRY TO SAVE SOMEBODY BECAUSE WE DID NOT HAVE EQUIPMENT? SO. NOT EXACTLY.

I KNOW THERE HAVE BEEN SOME INSTANCES THAT WE'VE CALLED LIFEGUARDS TO COME OUT AFTER HOURS, AND THEY WERE EITHER IN ROUTE TO GET THE JET SKI AND COME HELP US OUT.

BUT, YOU KNOW, IN THAT TRANSITION, EITHER WE FOUND THE PERSON OR SOMEONE ELSE FOUND THE PERSON.

MAYBE THEY WERE WALKING DOWN THE BEACH.

THE MOST FREQUENT INSTANCES AFTER HOURS USUALLY OCCUR WITH A LOST CHILD ON THE BEACH.

ONCE THE LIFEGUARDS GO HOME, 4 OR 5 IN THE EVENING AND, YOU KNOW, PEOPLE COME BACK OUT AND WE DON'T KNOW OFTEN IF THE CHILD MADE IT TO THE WATER OR NOT.

THERE HAVE BEEN SEVERAL INSTANCES WHEN I'VE WORKED AT NIGHT.

WHERE WE'VE HAD SOMEONE WHO GOES INTO THE OCEAN WHO WAS THREATENED TO COMMIT SUICIDE WAS HAVING SOME OTHER SORT OF, YOU KNOW, ISSUE.

AND WE KNOW THEY SWAM OUT OR WALKED OUT OR WADED OUT BECAUSE WE HAD WITNESSES TELL US THAT.

SO IN THOSE INSTANCES, TO BE ABLE TO CALL OUT A LIFEGUARD AND FOR THEM TO SAY, HEY, I CAN COME OUT WITH THREE PEOPLE AND COME IMMEDIATELY TO THE LIFEGUARD STATION AND LAUNCH A JET SKI, OR GET THEIR PADDLE BOARDS OR WHATEVER THEY NEED TO ATVS DOWN THE BEACH.

IT IS NICE TO HAVE THEM THERE AND HAVE THAT CAPABILITY.

I CAN'T GIVE YOU THE FREQUENCY, BUT IT'S ONE OF THOSE THINGS THAT IT'S IT'S ONE OF THOSE, SERIOUS INCIDENTS WHEN WHEN IT HAPPENS, YOU'RE GLAD YOU HAVE THOSE ASSETS THERE.

AND FOR THE REST OF THE TIME, MOST OF THE TIME, WE DON'T NEED THEM.

AND THAT'S THE HONEST ANSWER.

BUT WHEN YOU NEED THEM, YOU NEED THEM.

EAT THEM BAD. THANK YOU.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR CHIEF? OKAY. THANK YOU. SO WHERE I AM IS I'M NOT SURE THAT ALL THIS INFORMATION IS, IS GREAT, BUT WHAT'S THE WHAT DO YOU RECOMMEND AS NEXT STEPS? BECAUSE WE'RE NOT TAKING ACTION PER SE ON ANYTHING TONIGHT.

YOU'RE SIMPLY INFORMING US.

DO WE WANT TO TRY TO PUT IT ON THE AGENDA FOR THE NEXT MEETING TO TAKE ACTION SO THAT.

YEAH, THAT THAT'S THE QUESTION IS, YOU KNOW, JUST SOME GUIDANCE, THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO PRIORITIZE THAT AS WELL.

SO. YEAH. SO. BASICALLY, WOULD YOU PREFER TO PULL FROM RESERVES, OR WOULD YOU PREFER TO PULL OUT OF THE EXISTING BUDGET? OUR RECOMMENDATION IS WE PREFER OUT OF THE EXISTING BUDGET AS THE DOOR STREET, BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE THE MONEY ACTUALLY IS.

AND THEN NOW.

AND THEN, SORRY.

WHICHEVER ROUTE THE COMMISSION CHOOSES TO GO WILL PREPARE AN AMENDMENT TO THE BUDGET FOR THE NEXT, NEXT COMMISSION MEETING, AND WE'LL PROCEED.

[00:40:02]

WHERE DOES THAT PUT US? WITH THE DOOR DRY.

WE WOULD, BE ON HOLD.

WE'D BE AT RISK.

SO THE SELLER MAY FIND ANOTHER BUYER BETWEEN NOW AND THE NEXT BUDGET CYCLE.

IF HE DOESN'T, WE WOULD, SEEK TO APPROPRIATE THE MONEY TO PURCHASE THAT AT THAT TIME.

SO I DON'T HAVE THE FINAL OPINION OF WHICH WAY I GO ON THIS, BUT, WE REALLY ALL FIVE OF US NEED TO REALLY PUT SOME THOUGHT INTO THIS BECAUSE, I AGREE THAT YOUR DRIVE IS IS ABOUT RESILIENCY.

IT MATTERS TO ME A LOT.

I DON'T WANT TO LOSE THAT.

BUT AT THE SAME TIME, I'M ONE OF FIVE AND I, I AM NOT SO PASSIONATE THAT I CAN'T ADJUST MY THINKING.

BUT WE NEED TO DECIDE ON THAT.

AND THEN, WE'VE GOT RIGHT NOW, MR. KILLINGSWORTH, I BELIEVE WE HAVE ABOUT 30% IN RESERVES IN THE GENERAL FUND.

THAT IS, IF IF WE DID IF WE EXPENDED THE MONEY ON DOOR.

BUT NOT THE ADDITIONAL 700,000 ON THE.

I'VE NOT DONE THE CALCULATION ON WHERE DRAWING A SO YOU'RE LOOKING AT DRAWING TONIGHT $750,000 FOR 101ST STREET.

AND THEN IF YOU WANTED TO PULL ANOTHER 700,000 FOR THE LIFEGUARDS, YOU'RE LOOKING AT $1.4 MILLION COMING OUT OF RESERVES. I DON'T KNOW WHERE THAT WOULD PUT US.

WE ARE SITTING SOMEWHERE AROUND 30% RIGHT NOW.

SO PERHAPS AT THE NEXT MEETING, YOU COULD GIVE US A NUMERICAL REPORT ON THAT, TELLING US WHERE WE WOULD BE AT 25%, BECAUSE, IF THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE FORGOTTEN, I BELIEVE, OUR CPA, THAT OUR AUDIT, I THINK CPA, SUGGESTED THAT 25% IS THE RECOMMENDED MINIMUM OR MAYBE MAYBE NOT MINIMUM, BUT THAT'S THE RECOMMENDED AMOUNT.

AND SO AS WE ENTERED THIS BUDGET YEAR, I THINK WE WERE AT 39% OR NO WAS AT THAT TIME.

WELL, UNFORTUNATELY, I WASN'T HERE AT THE BEGINNING OF THE VOTING, ALL RIGHT.

BUT IT WAS IT WAS PRETTY HIGH.

SO, SO THEN THIS GETS CONFUSING BECAUSE THE NEXT PART OF THIS IS WE'RE POTENTIALLY, GOING TO GOING TO APPROPRIATE AND SPEND MONEY ON, 100 WEST FIRST STREET.

AND WE STILL DON'T HAVE A PLAN FOR THE USE OF THAT FACILITY.

WE HAVE SOME GREAT IDEAS.

SO BEFORE WE GO ANY FURTHER, HAVE WE, I THOUGHT WE DISCUSSED IT, BUT HAVE WE PUT TOGETHER A SURVEY MONKEY FOR THE PUBLIC TO ACTUALLY GIVE US THEIR INPUT? I'VE TASKED AMANDA WITH THAT.

I DON'T KNOW THE STATUS OF WHERE IT'S AT JUST YET.

NO. SO MY ASK OF THE COMMISSION IS THAT WE DIRECT THE CITY MANAGER TO COMPLETE THAT BETWEEN NOW AND THE NEXT MEETING, AND THEN TO BRING ALL THIS BACK. BUT I DON'T KNOW HOW I MAKE A FINAL DECISION UNLESS I KNOW WHETHER WE ARE OR ARE NOT GOING TO PROCEED WITH THE 100 WEST FIRST STREET.

AND THEN I WILL AT LEAST STATE NOW I'M NOT REAL KEEN ON.

PICKING AWAY AT THE EXCESS RESERVES IN THE GENERAL FUND.

SO WE WE LOOKED AT THAT BECAUSE I THOUGHT DORA DRIVE WAS SO IMPORTANT FOR RESILIENCY, BUT I DON'T WANT TO JUST LOOK AT EVERY PROJECT AND, AND GO BACK AND SEE IF WE HAVE EXCESS RESERVES. ANY ANY OTHER COMMENTS? I'D LIKE TO JUST SAY ONE THING I'D TAG ON TO THAT I'D LIKE TO KNOW BECAUSE I, I THINK THREE OF US HAD VOTED FOR THESE OVER THREE AND A HALF YEARS.

LET, LET LET US KNOW WHAT? THE LIFEGUARD ENDORSED US.

YEAH. THOSE TWO THAT WERE UP FOR A VOTE WHERE IT PUTS US, I DON'T KNOW, FINANCIALLY.

IN OTHER WORDS, WHAT'S THE TOTAL RIGHT? HOW MUCH RESERVES WOULD WE HAVE TO GO INTO? WHERE WOULD THAT THAT PUT US IN THE BIG PICTURE.

YOU KNOW, MAYBE YOU CAN MAKE A CHART AND SURE, YOU KNOW, A, B, AND C, BUT THOSE ARE TWO THAT WE HAVE ALREADY DISCUSSED.

SO DORA IS CURRENTLY FUNDED.

SO IT DOESN'T IT DOESN'T CHANGE IT.

IT'S THE LIFEGUARD STATION WILL CHANGE IT.

THAT'LL BE 700,000.

AND IF YOU, APPROVE THE 100 FIRST STREET.

SO REALLY THAT'S THE BALANCE.

SO MAYBE $1.4 MILLION HIT TO THE RESERVES.

SO MAYBE I MISUNDERSTOOD.

I THOUGHT WE WERE TALKING ABOUT MAYBE, HOLDING ON DORA AND USING THOSE FUNDS TO CLOSE THE DELTA ON THE LIFEGUARD STATION.

CORRECT. SO IF THAT'S WHAT YOU DO, THEN THERE'S NO HIT TO THE RESERVES.

IF YOU KEEP DORA, THEN THERE'S A $700,000 HIT TO THE RESERVES.

IF YOU KEEP DORA, DO THE LIFEGUARD STATION AND DO 100 WEST STREET.

IT'S ABOUT A $1.4 MILLION HIT TO THE RESERVES.

OKAY. YEAH. AND IF YOU COULD COME UP WITH A PERCENTAGE TO WHERE THAT PUTS THOSE IN TERMS OF THE RIGHT OR I MEAN, WE'RE WE'RE RELATIVELY HEALTHY.

YOU KNOW, LET'S JUST SAY THAT, FIRST OF ALL, TO COMPARE ALL THE CITIES ON THE COAST HERE.

OKAY. YEAH. BUT I AGREE WITH THAT.

I NEED MORE INFORMATION TO MAKE.

THESE ARE BIG PROJECTS.

[00:45:03]

AND MORE INFORMATION IS GOING TO HELP US.

THEY HAVE TO MAKE A HARD DECISION ANYWAY, BUT HOPEFULLY JUST MAKE IT MORE LOGICAL.

YEAH. THANKS. OKAY.

YEAH. AND, MR. KILLINGSWORTH, IF YOU COULD PUT IT IN SOMETHING VISUAL THAT I COULD LOOK AT BEFOREHAND, THAT WOULD HELP ME AS WELL.

OKAY. ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU. AND THANK YOU, MR. KILLINGSWORTH. LET'S MOVE TO ITEM FOUR.

[4. REPORTS AND/OR REQUESTS FROM CITY COMMISSIONERS]

REPORTS AND REQUESTS FROM COMMISSIONERS.

LET'S START WITH, COMMISSIONER KELLY.

NOTHING TONIGHT. OKAY.

COMMISSIONER BOLE. I JUST I THINK THAT DISCUSSION, WE JUST HAD SOME VERY IMPORTANT, YOU KNOW, TO FRAME THIS BECAUSE WE'VE BEEN.

SO I'LL LOOK FORWARD NEXT WEEK TO, YOU KNOW, BECAUSE I THINK SOME OF THE THINGS THE COMMISSION'S DECIDED ON.

AND SO I WANT TO SEE, YOU KNOW, THE OUTCOME AND WHAT THE DOLLARS ARE.

SO I APPRECIATE I LOOK FORWARD TO SEEING THAT.

THANKS, COMMISSIONER.

RING. YEAH. I WANT TO GIVE A SHOUT OUT TO SCOTT WILLIAMS. I SENT HIM AN EMAIL A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO.

A NEIGHBOR OF MINE NEEDED A CULVERT CLEANED OUT, AND HE HAD, I THINK HE RESPONDED TO ME WITHIN 12 HOURS AND HE HAD IT TAKEN CARE OF WITHIN A WEEK. AND THAT WAS ONLY BECAUSE THE TRUCK WASN'T AVAILABLE.

AND THEN HE UPDATED ME RIGHT AWAY.

SO I APPRECIATE THAT. SCOTT AND I KNOW MY NEIGHBORS DID AS WELL.

I ALSO WANT TO THANK MR. KILLINGSWORTH AND WHOEVER ELSE WAS, PART OF THE REMOVAL OF THAT ROUNDABOUT ON NINTH AND MAIN STREET.

I'VE. I WAS WAITING TO HEAR THE BACKLASH.

YOU ALWAYS HAVE THE GOOD AND THE BAD, BUT I SO FAR HAVE NOT HEARD A SINGLE COMPLAINT ABOUT IT, SO JUST APPLAUSE.

IN FACT, I WENT TO A NEIGHBORHOOD SUPER BOWL PARTY AND EVERYONE APPLAUDED.

SO THEY'RE ALL HAPPY.

I ALSO WANT TO THANK THE STAFF FOR PRIORITY SETTING MEETING LAST MONDAY.

I THOUGHT IT WENT REALLY WELL.

I DO WANT TO THANK ARC AND SC FOR SUBMITTING THEIR SUGGESTED GOALS.

I KNOW THAT I WROTE DOWN WE HAD A TOTAL OF 28 BETWEEN THE FIVE OF US THAT LINDA LANIER.

AND THANK YOU, LINDA, FOR FACILITATING THAT MEETING.

AND SHE VOLUNTEERS HER TIME TO DO THAT FOR NOT JUST THE COMMISSION, BUT FOR EVERY ONE OF OUR COMMITTEES.

SO WE HAD 28 GO UP AND WE EACH HAD TEN DOTS.

SOME SOME OF US USE OUR DOTS MORE THAN ONE DOT ON THE SAME GOAL TO REALLY EMPHASIZE THINGS.

BUT, I KNOW THAT OUR DEPUTY CITY MANAGER, KEVIN, DID A GREAT JOB LAST YEAR, COMBINING ALL OF THEM INTO OUR 2023 GOALS.

I REALLY LIKED HOW, KEVIN PRESENTED OUR 2023 GOALS, WHERE WE WERE IN EACH OF THOSE AND WHICH ONES HE SUGGESTED WE COULD REVISIT. THAT WAS HELPFUL.

SO I KNOW HE'S GOING TO DO THAT THIS TIME AROUND, AND WE'LL GET A DRAFT UP THERE.

WE'LL SEE SOME ESC AND ART GOALS THERE AS WELL, I'M SURE, INTEGRATED THROUGHOUT THE ONES THAT GOT THE MOST VOTES.

I THINK THAT'S IT.

OKAY. COMMISSIONER WATERS.

YEAH. I WANT TO THANK, AMANDA AND, VIC AND, CITY MANAGER KILLINGSWORTH.

THEY SENT OUT A NOTICE THAT THEY WERE GOING TO BEGIN TO TRIM AWAY SOME TREES AROUND THE, AROUND THE CAMERA.

SO ON 18TH STREET AND PROBABLY OTHER PLACES.

THAT WAS VERY THOUGHTFUL, BECAUSE WHEN PEOPLE COME OUT THERE AND THEY START CUTTING DOWN TREES WITH NO INFORMATION ABOUT IT.

EVERYBODY GETS REAL NERVOUS.

SO THAT WAS VERY HELPFUL.

AND ALSO PUTTING THOUGHT INTO IT WHERE YOU HAVE TO CUT IT BACK FAR ENOUGH, WE'RE NOT GOING TO COME BACK EVERY MONTH AND CUT IT AGAIN.

BUT JUST THE THOUGHT OF WHERE YOU GOT TO CUT IT, WHERE IT'S GOING TO HOPEFULLY BE 3 TO 6 MONTHS OR WHATEVER.

WAS JUST VERY THOUGHTFUL.

AND YES, I HAVE A LOT OF RESIDENTS DO THESE CAMERAS WORK? AND I TALKED TO CITY MANAGERS, SAID, YES, THEY WORK.

AND HE SAID, JUST ASK THE KID WHO GOT, PHOTO PAINTING THE SKATEPARK.

SO THEY DO WORK.

AND, I JUST APPRECIATE THE THOUGHT, THAT THEY PUT INTO THIS TIME.

I'VE GOT A COUPLE.

I'VE GOT ONE PATIENT AND TWO OTHER PEOPLE, ATLANTIC BEACH RESIDENTS.

THEY'RE ALL ATLANTA BEACH RESIDENTS.

BUT THEY WERE TALKING ABOUT THE THE PARKING LOT BEHIND RAGTIME.

AND THERE'S CONFUSION WITH WHERE THE ENTER ON AHERN STREET OR EAST COAST.

AND THEY WERE ALL TICKETED.

THEY WERE ALL TICKETED AND TOWED.

AND SO I TALKED TO, CITY MANAGER ABOUT THAT.

AND OBVIOUSLY WHENEVER WE REDO THE PARKING LOT, HOPEFULLY THAT'S GOING TO BE REMEDIED.

BUT WE ALSO TALKED ABOUT MAYBE BEFORE THAT DOES HAPPEN, TRYING TO SEE IF THERE'S SOME CONFUSION OVER THE SIGNAGE, TO WHERE WE WON'T HAVE TO WAIT, AND HAVE PEOPLE TICKETED BECAUSE ONCE THEY'RE TICKETED, THEY'RE TOWED AND YOU CAN'T GO BACK, WHEN THEY'RE EATING DINNER AND THEIR CAR IS GONE, THE DEED IS DONE.

SO WE'RE TRYING TO INTERVENE BEFORE PEOPLE ACTUALLY DO, PARK IN THE WRONG PLACE.

THERE WAS A LITTLE BIT OF CONFUSION THERE, SO WE'RE GOING TO WORK THAT OUT, BUT, AND ALSO, YEAH.

[00:50:07]

MR. JEVIC, I MEAN THIS.

THIS HAS BEEN, YOU KNOW.

THE THE HOMELESSNESS HAS BEEN AN ISSUE DOWN AT THE CORNER.

AND IT IS.

IT IS THE BUSINESSES.

IT'S THE RESIDENTS, THESE PEOPLE COMING HERE AND, WE'VE GOT TO FIND A WAY.

AND I'VE WE'VE TALKED ABOUT THIS OVER AND OVER AGAIN.

WE GOT TO FIND A WAY AND OPTIONS TO THIS BECAUSE, IT'S, IT'S AND SOMETIMES IT'S NOT SAFE AND PEOPLE JUST WANT TO GO ACROSS THE STREET AND AVOID THEM AND AVOID OTHERS.

AND I THINK WE HAVE TO FIND A BETTER WAY.

SO I APPRECIATE YOU BRINGING THAT UP.

AND THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO SAY.

THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER.

I HAVE TO AT LEAST COMMENT ON THAT.

AND I THANK MR. JEVIC FOR BRINGING THAT TO OUR ATTENTION.

BUT I DRIVE THROUGH BEACHES TOWN CENTER EVERY SINGLE DAY, AND I HAD SEEN THE SAME.

WE HAVE NOT SOLVED OUR PROBLEM.

I'M GOING TO ASK CHIEF VICK AND MR. KILLINGSWORTH TO MEET AND DISCUSS AND RESOLVE THIS.

WE SPENT ALL THAT TIME AND CITY MONEY TO REWRITE OUR ORDINANCE, NON CAMPING ORDINANCE, AND WE STILL ARE NOT ABLE TO FULFILL THE BARGAIN WITH OUR CITIZENS, WHICH IS TO GIVE THEM A SAFE, CLEAN, ATTRACTIVE ENVIRONMENT TO TAKE THEIR FAMILIES AND DYING AND SO ON.

SO WE WE CAN DO BETTER THAN THIS.

AND WHAT MY ASK OF THE CITY MANAGER AND AND THE CHIEF IS IF YOU DON'T THINK YOU CAN ENFORCE OUR CURRENT ORDINANCE OR THERE'S NO VIOLATION TO THAT ORDINANCE THAT YOU CAN ENFORCE, THEN CONSIDER OTHER REMEDIES.

TOWN CENTER, OR MAYBE WE NEED TO REMOVE, PARK BENCHES FOR SIX MONTHS TO TRY TO CLEAN IT UP.

BUT WE CAN ALL HAVE A HEART FOR THE UNHOUSED IN OUR COMMUNITY.

WHAT WE NEED TO REMEMBER IS THERE'S A BIG WIDE WORLD OUT THERE.

WE DO NOT HAVE TO HAVE OUR UNHOUSED IN THE MIDDLE OF A SIDEWALK.

AND WHEN A PEDESTRIAN COMES ALONG AND THE PERSON IS ASLEEP ON THE BENCH, THEY DON'T THEY'RE NOT MANAGING THEIR EQUIPMENT THAT IS PARKED THERE.

SO, I WOULD SUBMIT TO YOU THERE ARE TIMES WHERE THE CONGESTION IS NOT A GOOD THING.

AND AND WE REALLY CAN DO A BETTER JOB ON THAT.

THE OTHER THING I WANT TO BRING UP TODAY IS SEVERAL MONTHS AGO, I REACHED OUT TO THE DEEGAN ADMINISTRATION.

I, SPOKE WITH, MAYOR DEEGAN ABOUT, REVISITING AND HAVING A DIALOG ABOUT CLEANING UP THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT.

SO WE HAVE THE 1983 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT.

THEN WE HAVE THE I'LL CALL IT THE SUPPLEMENTAL.

MAYBE I SHOULD CALL IT THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT FROM 1995 IF I GET MY DATES CORRECT.

AND SO WHAT HAPPENED? TO REFRESH EVERYBODY'S MEMORY, IS THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH.

ASKED THE CITY OF JACKSONVILLE TO DO MORE UNDER THE ORIGINAL OR UNDER THE 1983 AGREEMENT.

ORIGINALLY THAT WASN'T, SATISFACTORY.

SO IT ENDED UP IN COURT.

AND SO THERE WAS A SETTLEMENT AND THE PARTIES SEPARATED.

AND HERE WE FAST FORWARD ALMOST 30 YEARS LATER.

BUT IN THAT 1995 AGREEMENT, IT SAID THAT WE WOULD GO BACK WITHIN ONE YEAR AND, MERGE THE TWO AGREEMENTS, THE 1983 AND THE 1995. SO 29 YEARS LATER, WE'VE NOT DONE THAT.

SO THAT IS THE IMPETUS AND THE, AND THE POSITION ON WHICH WE ARE STARTING THE DISCUSSION WITH THE DEEGAN ADMINISTRATION.

WE HAD OUR FIRST MEETING LAST WEEK.

I WANT TO THANK, MR. KILLINGSWORTH FOR PUTTING TOGETHER A GROUP TO REPRESENT THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH.

MORE TO FOLLOW. I HAVE NO OTHER FURTHER INFORMATION TODAY OTHER THAN THE FACT THAT WE HAVE STARTED THAT PROCESS.

AND WE WE WANT TO WORK WITH THE CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, NOT AGAINST THE CITY.

THIS IS NOT ABOUT THREATENING LAWSUIT.

THIS IS ABOUT CLEANING UP THE LANGUAGE.

AND IN THAT CLEANUP, PERHAPS, IDENTIFYING WHERE WE MAY HAVE A SHORTFALL OR TWO.

SO WE'LL WE'LL TALK MORE ABOUT THAT IN THE FUTURE.

AND THAT'S ALL I HAVE.

SO, LET'S SEE.

[7. COMMITTEE REPORTS]

COMMITTEE REPORTS WE HAVE AN ITEM SEVEN A WE HAVE A COMMITTEE REPORT FROM MR. ARTHUR, STOP COMMITTEE, COME ON UP.

[INAUDIBLE] MAYOR.

RICHARD ARTHUR.

IT'S NOT SAFETY, TRANSPORTATION AND PARKING.

I'M HERE TO GIVE AN UPDATE ON WHAT WE'VE BEEN WORKING ON, WHAT OUR TIMELINE IS.

KEVIN WAS HANDING OUT WHAT YOU'LL SEE.

I BELIEVE THERE'S THREE HANDOUTS.

[00:55:02]

THE FIRST ONE IS GOING TO BE OUR TENTATIVE TIMELINE, WHICH WILL COME UP SUBJECTS AND TOPICS, WHICH WILL BASICALLY TAKE US INTO THE SUNSET OF THE COMMITTEE, WHICH IS NOVEMBER OF THIS YEAR.

SO THAT'S BEEN POSTED.

THAT WILL SHOW A LITTLE BIT, IT'LL SHOW TO THE PUBLIC WHAT THE AGENDA ITEMS ARE THAT YOU CAN SUBMIT QUESTIONS, ATTEND.

SO THAT'S WHAT WE HAVE COMING UP.

WE RIGHT NOW, WE'VE JUST BEEN THROUGH THE REVIEW PARKING STANDARDS.

AS WE GET TO THE APPEARANCE ON SPEED LIMIT REVIEWS, PROBABLY WILL.

YOU'LL SEE OUR FIRST SUBMITTAL, BASICALLY IN TWO PARTS.

SO THE FIRST PART OF THE COMMITTEE AND THEN THE SECOND PART, STARTING WITH THE ACTUAL POLICY, TWO DIFFERENT SUBMITTALS ON THAT.

SO HERE YOU CAN SEE THE AGENDA ITEMS, WHAT WE'RE WORKING ON, WHAT WE WILL BE WORKING ON.

AND THEN THE NEXT PIECE HERE IS THE FIRST ONE THAT WE JUST COMPLETED, REVIEW OF PARKING STANDARDS.

AND IT'S A NUMBER OF POLICY QUESTIONS THAT YOU'LL SEE HERE.

AND IT'S BEEN GREAT I WOULD SAY WORKING WITH STAFF AS FAR AS SOME OF THE TOUGH POLICY QUESTIONS, CERTAINLY SAFETY, TRANSPORTATION, PARKING AVAILABILITY, AND HOW SHOULD STAFF INTERPRET CODE? WE SHOULD BE PROACTIVE.

WE SHOULD BE REACTIVE, ON SOME OF THESE ISSUES.

I ALSO LIKE TO NOTE, THIS COMMITTEE WORKS WELL WITH THE GRANT WAS AWARDED, THE $200,000 GRANT FROM THE CITY, 200,000 FOR THE GRANT, TO HELP THE CITY DEVELOP AND LOOK AT THEIR INDUSTRY AND MOBILITY POLICIES.

SO WHEN I BELIEVE THAT'S STILL HOW HAVE BEEN WHEN THAT COMES BACK, I THINK THE COMMITTEE IS A GREAT PLACE.

UNDER THAT GRANT, WHOEVER IS AWARDED THAT WILL HAVE QUESTIONS AND THAT COMMITTEE MEETING ON SOME OF THE QUESTIONS THAT THEY HAVE FROM THE POLICY.

FOR EXAMPLE, IN THE FIRST THREE POLICY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAD, MARKED SPACES, THE SECOND ONE, THE, RIGHT OF WAY OBSTRUCTIONS, AND THE THIRD ONE, VERTICAL STABILIZER COMPARTMENTS.

JUST A BRIEF, SUMMARY ON THOSE.

DEMARCATION OF PARKING SPACES.

THROUGH THAT PROCESS, WE IDENTIFIED THROUGH.

BASICALLY, THESE FOUR ZONES IN THE CITY, THAT YOU'LL SEE ARE ALL AREAS THAT.

TOWN CENTER AND ATLANTIC EACH.

KIND OF HAS THEIR OWN CHALLENGES ABOUT THEM.

DEMARCATION OF PARKING SPACES.

WE REALLY FOCUSED ON MAKING IT CONSISTENT.

SIGNAGE. CONSISTENT.

WE TRY TO STAY OUT OF THE WEEDS, LOOKING AT INDIVIDUAL SIGNS THAT DIDN'T MATCH A SIGN ON 18TH, 19TH OR FIFTH, AND MORE OR LESS HAVING THE OVERRIDING POLICY THAT ALL THE SIGNS SHOULD BE UNIFORM AND EQUAL.

THEY SHOULD ALL LEAVE THE SAME THING.

THEY SHOULD LOOK THE SAME WAY.

SO STAFF CAN THEN GO AND IMPLEMENT THAT POLICY.

AS FAR AS MAKING ALL THE SIGNAGE UNIFORM APART FROM UNIFORM AREAS.

WE RIGHT AWAY INSTRUCTIONS AND THAT'S A FUN ONE.

MOSTLY IN THE BEACH ZONE.

WE CONCENTRATE AND WE LOOKED AT IN THERE, THERE WAS NO QUESTION OF LOOKING IN THIS RELATIVE TO WHAT COULD THE CITY DO? AND IT WAS LESS ABOUT WHAT THE CITY CAN DO AND MORE OR LESS WHAT THE CITY SHOULD DO, IN THE SENSE THAT THE CITY COULD GO OVER THE COURSE AND THE RIGHT OF WAY, AND THEY CAN RIP UP EVERYTHING THEY'VE GOT, ALL THE THEY GOT EVERYTHING.

AND RIGHT AWAY THEY WANTED TO BE.

BUT SHOULD THEY DO THAT, WHEN SHOULD THEY DO THAT? YOU HAVE TO TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE HISTORICAL CHARACTER OF THE COMMUNITY RELATIVE TO WHAT YOU CAN DO WITH THE CITY AND MAKE THAT DECISION.

SO WE WE NARROWED THE FOCUS IN THAT AREA TO REALLY TO PUT THE STRIPE PATTERN WITHIN TWO FEET OF THE AREA, LINE OF SIGHT ISSUES, TO FOCUS ON WITHIN THAT POLICY.

AGAIN. AND I BELIEVE THE SECTION 91, WHAT CAN YOU PLANT IN THE RIGHT OF WAY? SO WE'RE NOT ARGUING ABOUT CHANGING THE POLICY OR WHAT YOU CAN AND CAN'T PLANT, YOU KNOW, RATHER MORE OR LESS.

HOW SHOULD THE CITY ENFORCE IT? WHEN SHOULD WE BE REACTIVE AND PROACTIVE IN THOSE AREAS THAT, AGAIN, WE BOIL THAT DOWN AND TAKE A LOOK INTO A SAFETY ISSUE.

STRIKE HAZARDS, LINE OF SIGHT.

RECEPTION. THE LAST PIECE WE LOOKED AT IN THIS AREA WAS, PERVIOUS SURFACE PARKING. I TRY TO STAY AWAY FROM THAT.

THAT'S JUST ONE METHODOLOGY OF HAVING A STABILIZED PARKING SYSTEM.

[01:00:05]

BUT THE INTENT WAS TO ESTABLISH FUN BEING A BUCKET WITHIN THE FUNDING PROCESS EVERY YEAR SO THAT IT CAN BE PULLED FROM THERE AND TO IMPROVE THE EXISTING PARKING SPACES, TO MAKE THEM THEIR EXISTING PARKING SPACES IN THE RIGHT WAY.

NOW THEY MAY BE JUST STAND OR.

DIRT OR MUD THAT'S BEEN OBVIOUSLY BEING USED FOR PARKING, TO STABILIZE THOSE AREAS AND TURN IT MORE INTO A SAFER PLACE FOR PEOPLE TO PARK IN THOSE AREAS.

THAT IS THAT SECTION THAT WE JUST WENT THROUGH.

AND OUR NEXT TOPIC TEED UP IS PARKING.

AND YOU CAN SEE WE HAVE STAFF HAS FIVE QUESTIONS, I BELIEVE RELATIVE TO THE PARKING THAT'S GOING TO BE THURSDAY.

SO WE'RE GOING TO GO THROUGH THOSE.

AND YOU ALSO PAY FOR PARKING QUESTIONS AND TOUGH QUESTIONS.

AND WE CAN SEE WHERE IT GOES FROM THERE.

SO HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

COMMENTS. I AM CERTAIN WE HAVE SOME QUESTIONS.

I JUST WANTED TO THANK MR. ARTHUR BECAUSE WHEN KEN COTTLE, STEPPED DOWN, I MEAN, WITHIN FIVE MINUTES YOU WERE ELECTED AND PUT IN THE SPOT AND, BY JOHN REICH. AND SO I APPRECIATE YOU DOING THIS.

IT'S BROUGHT A LOT OF A LOT OF LOGIC.

AND THE MAYOR, MANAGER KILLINGSWORTH AND MAYOR HAVE BEEN TO THESE MEETINGS, AND I'VE WENT TO A FEW OF THEM MYSELF, BUT I JUST I HAVEN'T READ ALL THIS.

OBVIOUSLY, I JUST GOT IT, BUT.

WE HAVE. YOU KNOW, WE HAVE NINE MONTHS TO GO.

AND I THINK THIS HAS TAKEN A LOT OF PRESSURE AND WORK OFF OF THE OFF THE COMMISSION.

AND I AND I THANK YOU FOR THAT.

AND I JUST HOPE BECAUSE ALL DISTRICTS ARE REPRESENTED IN THIS, IN THIS COMMITTEE, ALL OF THEM ARE.

AND AFTER A YEAR, I TRULY HOPE THIS TIME ALL YOUR WORK WILL BE VALIDATED.

WHATEVER YOU ALL DECIDE, WHATEVER YOU ALL DECIDE, IT WILL BE VALIDATED AND TAKEN FORWARD, YOU KNOW, FOR YEARS TO COME BECAUSE IT'S, I SAW THIS YEARS AGO. IT'S WHY I RAN FOR THIS POSITION WAS WAS SAFETY AND PARKING, THINGS LIKE THAT.

I SAW IT COMING, AND HERE IT IS.

AND AND I JUST APPRECIATE YOU GUYS, SYSTEMATICALLY ADDRESSING ALL THESE ISSUES.

THANKS. OTHER QUESTIONS.

SO I HAVE ONE FOR YOU.

SO, WAS IT YOUR LAST MEETING OR THE PREVIOUS ONE? YOU HAD A CITIZEN FROM FIFTH STREET COME AND SPEAK TO YOU ABOUT PARKING, IN FRONT OF A STOP SIGN.

AND IF I'M CLEAR ON THIS AND, MR. KILLINGSWORTH, CORRECT ME IF I'M UNCLEAR OR WRONG ON THIS, BUT, THIS FLORIDA STATUTES WOULD PROHIBIT PARKING WITHIN 30FT OF A STOP SIGN IF YOU ARE ON THE PAVEMENT. BUT FLORIDA STATUTES EITHER DOESN'T ADDRESS IT OR IF THEY DO, IT'S ALLOWED TO BE WITHIN 30FT OF THE STOP SIGN IF YOU'RE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY OFF THE PAVEMENT.

AND SO DO YOU KNOW THE ANSWER TO THAT? I BELIEVE IN GENERAL, YOU CORRECTLY STATED THAT.

SO IF IF I'M CORRECT ON THAT, MY UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT'S COME FROM THE, THE, DELIVERY FROM THE CITIZEN AND THEN, DISCUSSION WITH CITY STAFF, IS THAT OUR POLICY HISTORICALLY, OR AT LEAST FOR SOME TIME, HAS BEEN TO ALLOW PARKING WITHIN EIGHT FEET OF A STOP SIGN.

AND I KNOW, WE COULD ASK THAT QUESTION OF PUBLIC WORKS NOW, BUT, BUT HERE'S WHERE I'M GOING.

HAVE YOU OR ANYONE ON THE COMMITTEE LOOKED AT IF YOU PARK WITHIN EIGHT FEET, FOR EXAMPLE, OF A STOP SIGN IN THE GRASSY AREA OFF THE PAVEMENT IN THE RIGHT OF WAY, ARE YOU IN ANY WAY IN LINE OF SIGHT, OR ARE YOU WELL BACK FROM THE LINE OF SIGHT ISSUE? JUST TO BACK UP ON THAT ONE, YES, YOU ARE CORRECT.

AND I DID START OFF ON THAT ONE POSITION IN THAT POLICY, MAKING SURE THAT WE'RE FOLLOWING FLORIDA STATUTES AS FAR AS PARKING.

BUT ALL THE SETBACKS AND THE ONLY PERTAIN TO IN THE ROADWAY, NOT WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY.

SO FOR HIGHWAYS.

SO NOW WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE RIGHT OF WAY.

SO THE ISSUE IS HOW CLOSE TO THE TO THE STOP SIGN.

AND SHOULD THAT STOP BE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY.

AND WE GOT INTO THAT.

THAT WAS A CASE STUDY AS AN EXAMPLE.

AND AS WE LEFT COMING OUT OF THE, PARKING DEMARCATION CONVERSATION, WE ALL SAID THAT WE ARE LOOKING AT THAT NOW AS A LINE OF SIGHT ISSUE.

HOW CLOSE DO YOU WANT THAT STOP ARE IN THE RIGHT AWAY OF STOP SIGN? WELL, YOU DON'T WANT IT CLOSE ENOUGH THAT YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE A LINE OF SIGHT ISSUE AS THAT WE'RE GOING TO GET INTO THAT SPECIFIC ON THE UNIFORM STANDARD FOR DESIGNS COMING UP, IN A FEW MONTHS.

SO IT'S STILL AN OPEN ISSUE TO BE DISCUSSED, BUT THE OVERALL OPINION WAS THE POLICY SHOULD OR SHOULDN'T, SHOULDN'T HAVE A STOP, ARE SO CLOSE TO THE ARRIVAL AND STOP SIGN.

[01:05:02]

EVEN IF YOU HAD A FORD TRANSIT BOX TRUCK OR WHATEVER IT IS YOU'RE GOING TO DO, THEN YOU'RE GOING TO COVER LINE OF SIGHT ISSUES AROUND THE CORNER.

SO HOW FAR BACK DOES IT NEED TO BE TO WIN THE LINE OF SIGHT ISSUES THAT THAT'S THE GENESIS AND KIND OF THE THOUGHT PROCESS ON THAT, THAT WILL GET PICKED BACK UP ON THE UNIFORM STANDARDS.

SO WE DIDN'T PICK IT UP IN THE DEMARCATION SPACES.

BUT SO IS IT FAIR TO SAY THAT THE CONTRACT THAT WE HAVE TO DO THE CONSULTING WORK ON TRAFFIC AND SAFETY, THAT THAT IS WHERE YOU WILL ACTUALLY ENGAGE FOR FURTHER DIRECTION, DEFEAT FEEDBACK TO THE CITY? THAT'S HARD TO SAY. WITHIN THAT GRANT OR SAFETY, TRANSPORTATION MOBILITY STANDARDS AND SUCH.

THE RFP ISN'T PUT OUT AND I HAVEN'T READ IT SPECIFICALLY.

WHAT'S IN THE RFP FOR WHAT I THINK, WHO'S BIDDING ON IT AND HOW IT WHAT EXACTLY IS IN THAT? BUT I KNOW THERE WILL BE SOME COMMUNITY AND ENGAGEMENT PROCESS THAT THEY'LL TALK TO THE COMMITTEE ABOUT.

BUT I THINK THAT SPECIFIC CASE STUDY ISSUE COULD BE RESOLVED IN A SPLIT OF THAT LEVEL.

AND WE HAVE A CASE EXAMPLE THERE, AND WE HAVE A LINE OF IT'S A LINE OF SIGHT ISSUE.

YOU KNOW, WE JUST NEED TO FIND THAT POINT WHERE IT IS SO, SO YES, IT'S A QUESTION WHILE YOU'RE ON THAT IS WHAT'S THE MATH ON THE LINE OF SIGHT? I MEAN, I CAN YOU AND I BOTH KNOW IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD WE CAN GO TO A CORNER, YOU KNOW, THERE'S A BUSH THERE.

IT'S HARD TO TURN THAT WAY OR TURN THIS WAY.

IS THERE MATH ACTUALLY INVOLVED IN YOUR.

IN OTHER WORDS, DO I GET 30 DEGREES WHEN I COME UP TO THAT STOP SIGN? DO I GET 40 DEGREES? YOU SEE WHERE I'M GOING, I WOULDN'T KNOW, I'M NOT A PARKING PROFESSIONAL IN THE COMMUNITY HAS THE MATH.

I KNOW THE PARKING CONSULTANTS HAVE THAT DEGREE AND RADIUS..

BECAUSE IT'S IT VARIES.

RIGHT. AND I THINK WE, YOU KNOW, IT'S ALMOST LIKE, YOU KNOW, ZONES OR, YOU KNOW, CODES THAT WE'VE ENFORCED IN OTHER PLACES.

WE HAVEN'T BECAUSE I CAN I CAN GO DOWN AND SHOW YOU, AS YOU WELL KNOW, DIFFERENT CORNERS.

THE OTHER THING I JUST WANTED TO MENTION IS LAST WEEK WHEN WE DID OUR PRIORITY SETTING, I THINK IF I REMEMBER, ELECTRIC BIKES WERE AN ISSUE.

WE GOT A BUNCH OF DOTS, I THINK, ACROSS THE BOARD ON ELECTRIC BIKES.

THAT'S A THAT'S AN ISSUE.

THAT'S THAT'S FACING US.

IT'S GOING TO ONLY GET BIGGER IN THE FUTURE.

SO, YOU KNOW, I'D LIKE TO HEAR FROM FROM YOU GUYS, YOU KNOW, BECAUSE I UNDERSTAND THE FLORIDA STATUTE ETC., ETC..

BUT, I.

I THINK IT'S BECOMING MORE AND MORE OF AN ISSUE.

ARE YOU GUYS SPECIFICALLY GOING TO LOOK AT THAT? SO RIGHT NOW WE ONLY HAVE POLICY QUESTIONS GOING INTO PAY FOR PARKING PROGRAM.

MAYBE UNDER SPEED LIMIT REVIEW WE THINK THERE'S STILL OPPORTUNITY TO SLIDE IN SPECIFIC QUESTIONS FROM STAFF AND COMMISSION RELATIVE TO THE SPEED BIKES.

I KNOW THERE'S OTHER CITIES OUT THERE NOW THAT DO HAVE LANGUAGE IN PLACE THAT CAN BE REVIEWED.

IT'S BEEN WORKSHOPPED IN OTHER CITIES.

BUT I MEAN, IT'S THERE'S PLENTY OF AREAS WHERE THAT CAN GO THERE JUST DOESN'T BICYCLE CONNECTIVITY AND SAFETY, IS IT LAST ON POINT THERE? PLENTY OF ROOM TO FIT THAT IN.

WE JUST NEED TO. YEAH, BECAUSE IT WAS A CONCERN ACROSS THE BOARD AND I, I THINK IT'S, YOU KNOW, IT'S ONLY GOING TO BE.

YEAH. IF I MAY ADD TO THAT, THERE'S NO I DON'T THINK THERE'S ANY CHALLENGE OF ADJUSTING THE CALENDAR.

I THINK BETWEEN YOU AND, MR. KILLINGSWORTH, YOU'VE DONE A GOOD JOB OF SETTING OUT THE GOALS BY QUARTER, I THINK, SO THAT YOU HAVE, CONTROLLED CHAOS.

OKAY. SO STAFF POLICY QUESTIONS OUT THERE, IT WAS LOOKED A LITTLE BIT OF A SLOW START BECAUSE THE SUBJECT IS SO BROAD.

AND WHERE DO YOU START? HOW FAR DO YOU GET INTO IT? SO WE HAD A NICE.

WELL, I THINK YOU GUYS ARE ON THE RIGHT TRACK AND DOING GREAT STUFF, BUT I WOULD ASK, AND I THINK I MIGHT HAVE A CONSENSUS ON THIS THAT WE REORDER, IF NECESSARY, ON THE CALENDAR TO ADDRESS, E-BIKES.

IT IS. WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT IT, SINCE I BECAME MAYOR, AND PROBABLY WELL BEFORE THAT.

AND IT DID. I THINK WE GOT FIVE VOTES ON THAT AS A PRIORITY.

SO WE HAVE THE POWER TO CHANGE, AND YOU HAVE MR. KILLINGSWORTH ON YOUR OR SITTING IN ON YOUR COMMITTEE.

SO IF YOU CAN DISCUSS THAT AND SEE IF WE CAN GET THAT ADVANCED AND GET SOME INFORMATION BACK, BECAUSE, TO THE POINT MADE EARLIER BY COMMISSIONER WATERS, WE GOT NINE MONTHS LEFT IN THIS, YEAR TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE WITH THE STOP COMMITTEE.

AND I WOULD HATE TO SEE THIS DRAG RIGHT TO THE END AND NOT GET DONE.

YES, COMMISSIONER. I THINK BIKES IN GENERAL, THERE'S A LOT OF PEOPLE DRIVING IN THE DARK WITH NO LIGHTS AND NOT STOPPING.

AND, YOU KNOW, THE IN ADDITION TO REGULAR ADDITION E-BIKES, JUST REGULAR BIKES, WHICH IF WE COULD PUT MORE EMPHASIS ON BIKES, IT MIGHT HELP SOLVE SOME PARKING PROBLEMS. YEAH, OKAY.

THANK YOU FOR THE REPORT AND THANK YOU FOR STEPPING UP.

[01:10:04]

AND I DID WANT TO CLARIFY BECAUSE, I DON'T RECALL, MR. ARTHUR RAISING HIS HAND.

SO HE DID NOT RAISE HIS HAND, BUT HE HE ACCEPTED THE CHALLENGE RIGHT AFTER, AFTER HE WAS NOMINATED.

I THANK YOU FOR THAT, MR. ARTHUR. THANK YOU. THANKS.

MR. MAYOR, IF I MAY. YES.

SO, MR. ARTHUR WAS ALSO GRACIOUS ENOUGH TO BE FIRST FOR YOUR COMMITTEE REPORTS.

AND THEN, NEXT COMMITTEE WILL HAVE THE CHAIR OF ART WHO WILL GIVE AN UPDATE.

OKAY. VERY GOOD.

ALL RIGHT. WE'LL MOVE ON TO, ACTION ON RESOLUTIONS.

[8.A. RESOLUTION NO. 24-05]

WE HAVE, ITEM EIGHT, A RESOLUTION NUMBER 24, - ZERO FIVE, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA, APPROVING TWO VEHICLES AS SURPLUS AND AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO PURCHASE TWO NEW TRUCKS, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACTS AND PURCHASE ORDERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH, AND AS NECESSARY TO EFFECTUATE THE PROVISIONS OF THIS RESOLUTION AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

MR. KILLINGSWORTH, THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR. SO THIS IS A RESOLUTION TO SURPLUS TWO TRUCKS AND TO PURCHASE TWO TRUCKS.

AND FORTUNATELY, WITH THE SURPLUS AND THE AMOUNT THAT'S BUDGETED, WE ARE AT BUDGET.

AND SO WE DON'T NEED TO ASK FOR ANY ADDITIONAL MONEY.

AND THIS IS JUST FULFILLING THE PRIORITY SET IN THE BUDGET TO PURCHASE TWO TRUCKS FOR PUBLIC WORKS.

ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU.

DO I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NUMBER 24-05, I MOVE TO APPROVE 24-05 SECOND.

OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER RING.

A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER BOLE.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR SIGNIFY WITH I.

I THAT'S UNANIMOUS.

THANK YOU. RESOLUTION.

[8.B. RESOLUTION NO. 24-06]

THIS IS NOW ITEM EIGHT B RESOLUTION NUMBER 24, - ZERO SIX, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF THREE HIGH MAST LIGHT POLES AT THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACTS AND PURCHASE ORDERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH, AND AS NECESSARY TO EFFECTUATE THE PROVISIONS OF THIS RESOLUTION AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

MR. KILLINGSWORTH, MR. MAYOR, SO THIS IS ANOTHER PROJECT THAT WAS, IN THE CIP AND BUDGETED.

THIS PROJECT ACTUALLY CAME IN $20,000 UNDER, AND SO WHAT WE'RE DOING IS WE HAVE THREE MAST POLES AT THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT THAT HAVE BEEN DAMAGED AS A RESULT OF STORMS. THEY ARE A 55 FOOT POLES.

WE ARE REPLACING THEM WITH 35 FOOT POLES.

OKAY. RIGHT.

DO WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 20 4-06I MOVE, WE ADOPT RESOLUTION NUMBER 2406 AS READ.

SECOND. OKAY.

WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER KELLY.

A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER WATERS.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? YOUR GUIDE.

WHAT HE NEEDS. HEARING NONE.

ALL IN FAVOR SIGNIFY WITH AYE.

AYE.

OPPOSED. THE MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.

THANK YOU. ITEM EIGHT, C RESOLUTION, NUMBER 24-07, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA, AWARDING BID NUMBER

[8.C. RESOLUTION NO. 24-07]

2324-02 FOR BUCCANEER LIFT STATION FLOODPROOFING.

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE CONTRACTS AND PURCHASE ORDERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH, AND AS NECESSARY TO EFFECTUATE THE PROVISIONS OF THIS RESOLUTION AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

MR. KILLINGSWORTH.

THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR.

SO, UNFORTUNATELY, THIS IS A SITUATION WHERE IT CAME IN WAY OVER BUDGET.

THE AMOUNT BUDGETED FOR THE, THIS IS THE HARDEN AND FLOOD PROOF, LIFT STATION AT BUCCANEER.

WE BUDGETED $394,600.

THE STAFF REPORT IS IN THE SLIDE AREA.

IT SAYS 394,000, BUT IT IS THREE 94,600.

AND UNFORTUNATELY, THE LOW BID CAME IN AT $981,000.

SO STICKING WITH MY, PREFERENCE TO WORK WITHIN THE BUDGET, YOU GUYS, HAVE ALREADY APPROPRIATED, WE CAN FULFILL THIS PROJECT.

AND IF YOU LOOK AT PAGE 105104, YOU CAN SEE, THOSE ELECTRICAL PANELS ARE JUST INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOD.

AND HAD THEY BEEN FLOODED, WE WOULD HAVE LOST THE LIFT STATION.

SO THIS IS A CRITICAL PROJECT.

WE'RE PROPOSING THAT WE MOVE $250,000 FROM THE LIFT STATION RETROFITTING AND ANOTHER $336,400 FROM AN INFILTRATION AND INFLOW CONTROL.

PROJECT, WHICH WILL MAKE UP THE BALANCE FOR THE $981,000.

AS YOU CAN SEE BY THESE PICTURES, THIS IS A PRETTY CRITICAL IMPROVEMENT.

YEAH. OKAY.

THANK YOU. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NUMBER 24-07.

I MOVED TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NUMBER 24-07.

[01:15:01]

SECOND. OKAY, WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.

I HAVE A QUESTION.

I CERTAINLY AM IN SUPPORT OF THIS.

AND ESPECIALLY AFTER LOOKING AT THOSE PHOTOS.

THAT'S A GREAT VISUAL.

BUT I DO HAVE A QUESTION.

IF THE LIFT STATION WAS FLOODED, WOULD IT SIMPLY SHUT DOWN, OR IS THERE EVER A POSSIBILITY THAT IT WOULD ACTUALLY CAUSE A SPILL? SO DID STEVE GO HOME? YEAH, I BELIEVE A WE WOULD HAVE A CHOICE HERE.

WHY DON'T YOU COME UP? CHOICE. SO WE'LL LOSE.

WE'LL DEFINITELY LOSE THE ELECTRICAL PANELS.

THE PANELS, OPERATE THE PUMPS.

AND IT IS A LIFT STATION.

SO THAT SEWAGE WOULD, ULTIMATELY BACK UP SOMEWHERE.

SO IT WOULD BE IN MY IN MY LIVING ROOM.

POTENTIALLY. PROBABLY NOT THE BUCCANEER SIDE.

YES. YEAH. YEAH, I GOT YOU.

YES. OKAY. WELL, I MEAN, TO ME, FOR RESILIENCY IN SO MANY OTHER REASONS, THIS IS A PRIORITY, I THINK.

I BELIEVE SO AS WELL.

YEAH, YEAH. SO.

ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. TROY.

ALL RIGHT. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR SIGNIFY WITH I, I THAT'S UNANIMOUS.

THANK YOU. MOVING TO ITEM EIGHT, D RESOLUTION, NUMBER 24-08, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE FEDERALLY

[8.D. RESOLUTION NO. 24-08]

FUNDED SUB AWARD AND GRANT AGREEMENT NUMBER Z4086 AND ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO, AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

MR. KILLINGSWORTH. SO THIS IS A CONTRACT THAT FEMA REQUIRES THAT WE ENTER INTO THIS MASTER CONTRACT.

AND AS REIMBURSEMENTS COME IN, WHEN WE HAVE THE EXACT DOLLAR AMOUNTS, WE'LL MAKE AMENDMENTS TO THE CONTRACT.

AND SO THE ASK IS A THAT COMMISSION ALLOW THE MAYOR TO SIGN THIS CONTRACT.

AND THEN B, AS WE GET ACTUAL COST REIMBURSEMENTS, THAT WE AMEND THE CONTRACT FOR THOSE ACTUAL COST REIMBURSEMENTS.

OKAY. SO WHAT YOU'RE SAYING IS THIS IS NOT NECESSARILY THE FINAL NUMBER THAT'S ON THE REPORT.

THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY, OKAY.

AND BY APPROVING THIS TONIGHT, WE WOULDN'T HAVE TO COME BACK FOR EACH AMENDMENT TO ASK FOR THE MAYOR TO BE ABLE TO SIGN THE AMENDMENTS.

RIGHT. IS THERE A MOTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NUMBER 24-08.

I'LL MAKE A MOTION. WE ADOPT RESOLUTION NUMBER 24-08.

SECOND.

RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION FROM DOCTOR, FROM COMMISSIONER WATERS AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER BOLE.

ALL IN FAVOR SIGNIFY WITH AYE.

AYE. OPPOSED.

THAT WAS ALSO UNANIMOUS.

THANK YOU. ITEM EIGHT E RESOLUTION NUMBER 24-09, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING CHANGE ORDERS FOR THE PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING

[8.E. RESOLUTION NO. 24-09]

RENOVATIONS PROJECT, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACTS AND PURCHASE ORDERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH, AND AS NECESSARY TO EFFECTUATE THE PROVISIONS OF THIS RESOLUTION AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

MR. KILLINGSWORTH. SO THIS IS A SITUATION WHERE SO THIS IS THE PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING, WHICH IS UNDER CONTRACT AND BEING RENOVATED RIGHT NOW.

THIS IS THE CHALLENGE YOU FIND WITH ANY OLD BUILDING.

ONCE WE GOT THE INTERIOR WALLS PULLED OFF AND EVERYTHING, THEN THERE WAS A NUMBER OF THINGS THAT WE DIDN'T ANTICIPATE.

THE BIGGEST EXPENSE ONE IS THERE IS THERE SHOULD BE A FIRE RATED WALL AND THERE IS NO FIRE RATED WALL.

SO THAT'S $109,000 EXPENSE.

THOSE ARE WIRING ISSUES THAT WE DISCOVERED WHEN THE CEILING WAS TAKEN OUT.

SO THERE ARE A NUMBER OF, CHANGE ORDERS.

I ASKED SCOTT TO GIVE ME THE FULL BUCKET AT ONE SHOT, NOT TO COME IN HERE AND PIECEMEAL THEM IN.

SO THAT'S SOMEWHAT WHY THE WHY THE PRICE TAG IS WHAT IT IS.

WE ARE NOT WE BEING THE CITY ARE NOT, TAKING THE FULL BURDEN.

THE CONTRACTOR IS GOING TO ABSORB SOME OF THE COST.

BUT IN ORDER TO MAKE UP THE DIFFERENCE, WE ARE GOING TO POSTPONE THE SHED FOR PUBLIC WORKS AND, WHICH IS ABOUT $240,000.

AND THEN WE'RE RECOMMENDING THAT WE TAKE $33,384 FROM, THE MILLING AND PAVING PROJECT THAT WILL TOTAL UP TO THE, $273,000 THAT WE NEED TO MAKE UP FOR OUR PART OF THE DEFICIT.

WE'RE ONLY GOING TO DO THIS ONCE, MAYBE EVERY 50 YEARS, SO WE SHOULD WE SHOULD GET IT RIGHT THIS TIME.

SO STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION TO GO AHEAD AND REALLOCATE THE MONEY FROM THOSE OTHER TWO PROJECTS AND GET THIS ONE FINISHED.

OKAY. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NUMBER 24-09.

MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 2409.

SECOND. OKAY.

WE HAVE A MOTION. AND A SECOND.

I JUST WANT TO COMMENT.

I HAVE, BEEN TO, THE, PUBLIC WORKS YARD, AND, SCOTT WILLIAMS, HAS SHOWN ME ALL OF THE DETAILS.

AND THIS IS JUST WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU START OPENING UP WALLS ON A BUILDING THAT'S AS OLD AS THAT BUILDING.

SO, IT IS AN ABSOLUTE NEED TO GET THAT DONE.

RIGHT? SO I SUPPORT THAT.

SO IF THERE'S NO FURTHER DISCUSSION, ALL IN FAVOR SIGNIFY WITH I, I OPPOSED THAT WAS UNANIMOUS AS WELL.

[01:20:04]

THANK YOU. OKAY, MOVING TO ITEM NINE, A ORDINANCE NUMBER 20-24-171.

[9.A. ORDINANCE NO. 20-24-171]

THIS IS, INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OPERATING BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF ATLANTIC BEACH, FLORIDA, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1ST, 2023 AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30TH, 2024.

AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, MR. KILLINGSWORTH. SO THIS IS, THE FUNDING FOR, 101ST WEST STREET.

WE MADE A $700,000 OFFER.

WE'RE GUESSING MAYBE $50,000 IN CLOSING COSTS.

THAT NUMBER IS STILL KIND OF SOFT, BUT, WE DECIDED WE'D GO AHEAD AND ASK FOR THE APPROPRIATION.

NOW WE STILL HAVE MAYBE 60 DAYS LEFT ON THE, ON THE DUE DILIGENCE PHASE.

AS I SAID IN THE UPDATE, WE HAVE THE ENVIRONMENTAL'S BACK.

WE HAVE THE BUILDING INSPECTION BACK.

WE HAVE THE TWO APPRAISALS BACK.

WE STILL HAVE 60 DAYS, BEFORE WE HAVE TO PULL A TRIGGER.

BASED ON THE CONVERSATION, WE MIGHT.

I MEAN, YOU MAY CHOOSE JUST TO DEFER THIS ISSUE, OR WE MAY HEAR IT AS A FIRST HEARING TONIGHT AND TAKE IT UP AGAIN.

BUT THIS IS THE $700,000 FOR THE.

101ST WEST STREET CLOSED ON THAT PROPERTY SO THAT WE HAVE THE MONEY IN THE BUDGET.

JUST, WE DISCUSS? YEAH. AFTER THE MOTION.

YEAH. LET'S GO AHEAD AND DO A MOTION.

WHO WILL MOVE ON? I MOVE TO APPROVE THE ORDINANCE NUMBER 2024-171.

SECOND. OKAY, WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.

NOW LET'S OPEN IT UP FOR DISCUSSION.

COMMISSIONER BOLE. YEAH.

YOU TALKED ABOUT THIS EARLIER.

AS FAR AS PRIORITIES AND MONEY.

YOU KNOW, I REALLY THINK, YOU KNOW, AM I FOR THIS? YES. OKAY.

BUT, FOR THIS NUMBER THREE FOR ME PERSONALLY, THE LIFEGUARD STAND, RESILIENCY.

AND THEN THIS, I KNOW IT'S THE FIRST READING.

I KNOW IT'S INITIAL.

MY QUESTION IS, I REALLY WANT TO SEE WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO WITH THIS BECAUSE YOU, YOU TALK ABOUT.

SO TECHNICALLY, THIS MONEY WOULD COME OUT OF THE RESERVE.

THAT IS CORRECT. OKAY.

AND SO NEXT, NEXT MEETING, YOU'RE GONNA TELL US WHAT PERCENTAGE THAT WOULD BE RIGHT FOR YOU.

I WILL ATTEMPT TO GIVE YOU A PERCENTAGE FOR EACH OF THE PERMUTATIONS.

THAT'S WHAT THAT'S WHAT I'M GOING FOR.

I MEAN, YOU KNOW, I AGREE WITH YOU THAT THERE'S A, YOU KNOW, THERE'S A LINE WE DON'T WANT TO CROSS.

AND AGAIN, THOSE ARE MY TWO QUESTIONS.

WHERE DOES IT PUT US IN REGARD TO RESERVE.

WHAT'S THE EXACT USE OF THE OF THE VILLAGE.

YES, COMMISSIONER KELLY.

SO IT SEEMS LIKE IT'S ALL COME TOGETHER ALL AT ONCE.

AND ACTUALLY THEY'RE ALL KIND OF A ONE TIME SPECIAL GOOD DEAL.

THIS IS JUST ABOUT THE LAST PIECE OF LAND THAT WE AS A CITY COULD ACQUIRE.

AND WE HAVE A GROWING POPULATION.

WE HAVE A WELL-EDUCATED POPULATION THAT HAS EXPECTATIONS ABOUT WHAT WE AS A CITY SHOULD BE ABLE TO PROVIDE FOR THEM.

AND SO JUST AS RESILIENCY, I DON'T WANT THIS TO HER TO COMING UP IN MY, IN MY HOUSE, BUT SO THAT'S CRITICAL TOO.

SO IT'S KIND OF LIKE, YOU KNOW, WHEN YOUR MICROWAVE AND YOUR, AND YOUR WASHING MACHINE AND YOUR CAR ALL GO OUT AT ONCE, YOU KIND OF HAVE TO GET THEM FIXED BECAUSE IT'S A ONE TIME SPECIAL. GOOD DEAL.

OKAY. AND, YOU KNOW, IF YOU'VE GOT YOU GOT MONEY IN THE BANK, SOMETIMES YOU HAVE TO COUGH IT UP.

OKAY. THANK YOU COMMISSIONER.

OTHER. THIS IS JUST A LOT OF MONEY.

ALL THESE I NEED SOME.

I NEED TO STEW OVER IT.

I NEED SOME MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THESE THESE TOPICS.

ANOTHER COUPLE OF WEEKS TO LOOK AT IT BECAUSE IT'S A LOT OF MONEY.

BUT 101ST CAN BE WHATEVER WE WANT IT TO BE.

THAT'S TRUE, YOU KNOW? AND WE DON'T HAVE TO DO IT.

WE DON'T HAVE TO DO IT NOW.

WE CAN GET IT AND AND AND SPEND TIME DOING IT RIGHT.

BUT. WHAT WE DID DO NOW IS WE KEPT THE MILLAGE RATE AT THE CURRENT RATE.

YEAH. RIGHT. THAT WAS I MEAN WE DID THAT OKAY.

SO THAT'S CALLED LIVING WITHIN YOUR BUDGET.

YEAH. SO BEFORE WE VOTE ON IT IT OCCURS TO ME I MEAN, YOU GET TWO CHOICES HERE.

WE CAN VOTE ON IT KNOWING THAT THIS IS THE FIRST READING AND YOU GET A SECOND CHANCE, YOU CAN VOTE IT DOWN NEXT TIME IF YOU WANT.

OR YOU COULD WITHDRAW THE MOTION AND TABLE IT FOR NOW AND BRING IT BACK.

WE STILL HAVE PLENTY OF TIME BEFORE WE HAVE TO PULL THE TRIGGER ON THE CONTRACT FOR, ONE 100 WEST FIRST.

YOU KNOW, I DIDN'T REALIZE THE LIFEGUARD STATION WAS NEARLY DOUBLE UNTIL YOU SET THOSE NUMBERS TODAY, BILL.

I KNEW IT HAD BEEN TABLED BECAUSE THE BID HAD COME BACK SO THAT I DIDN'T EXPECT THE LIFEGUARD STATION WAS ONE OF THE PRIORITIES I DID PUT UP ON MONDAY

[01:25:04]

NIGHT. NOT BECAUSE, I THOUGHT THEY NEEDED A NEWER STATION, BUT BECAUSE OF PUBLIC SAFETY.

AND I DON'T KNOW IF SHE WAS MENTIONING THE DROWNING THAT HAPPENED IN SEPTEMBER.

THAT DIDN'T MAKE NEWS.

AND THE MAN DID DIE.

AND HE WASN'T ATLANTIC BEACH RESIDENT.

SO PUBLIC SAFETY IS IMPORTANT NOT JUST FOR OUR CITIZENS AND OUR COMMUNITY, BUT THE LIFEGUARDS WHO PUT THEIR OWN LIVES AT RISK.

AND BLACK MOLD IS MAJOR THING.

SO I DO SEE LIFEGUARD STATION.

I HAVEN'T BEEN HERE IN THREE AND A HALF YEARS VOTING ALONGSIDE COMMISSIONER BOLE AND KELLY AND AND COMMISSIONER WATERS FOR THE SAME LIFEGUARD STATION TO WATCH IT GO UP.

BUT I DO REMEMBER LAST YEAR THAT IT HAD GONE UP.

SINCE THE PREVIOUS YEAR.

SO THAT IS SOMETHING WE TABLE AGAIN ARE.

YOU KNOW AND I KNOW MR. WILL KILLINGSWORTH DID BRING THAT UP.

ANYWAY, I WOULD LIKE SOME TIME TO THINK ABOUT THAT.

ALL THREE OF THOSE.

AND WHERE THAT LEAVES US WITH DOOR DRIVE, IF WE DO TABLE IT UNTIL THE NEXT BUDGET CYCLE, DO WE LOSE DORA? MR. KILLINGSWORTH, CAN I ASK YOU ANOTHER QUESTION? YOU DID SAY THAT WAS STAFF RECOMMENDATION ONLY BECAUSE THERE WERE TWO OPTIONS.

THERE WAS A STAFF RECOMMENDATION BECAUSE, IT'S IT'S MY PREFERENCE TO GIVE YOU AN OPTION THAT STAYS WITHIN THE ADOPTED BUDGET AND NOT TO HIT RESERVES, BUT IT IS AN OPTION TO TO PULL THE MONEY FROM RESERVES.

IT'S JUST EVERY CHANCE I HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY WHERE WE HAVE TO COME BACK TO THIS COMMISSION AND ASK FOR MONEY THAT IS ABOVE AND BEYOND THE BUDGET YOU GAVE US.

I'M GOING TO TRY TO FIND A SOLUTION WITHIN THE BUDGET THAT YOU GAVE US.

RIGHT. BUT YOU DIDN'T MENTION LIKE A THIRD OPTION, WHICH WOULD BE TO NOT GO FORWARD WITH 100 WEST.

THAT WASN'T THE THIRD OPTION.

NOW I'M FEELING LIKE THAT'S A THIRD OPTION.

IT IS A THIRD OPTION.

YES. THAT WASN'T ONE THAT THAT WE RECOMMENDED.

BUT BECAUSE I THINK LARGELY BECAUSE WE ALREADY HAD THE APPROPRIATION ON THE NOW WHEN WE STARTED WITH DORA, IT WAS LAST SPRING.

AND WE'VE BEEN GOING BACK AND FORTH AND, YOU KNOW, THE SELLER WASN'T COMPLETELY HE WASN'T FULLY DISCLOSING ALL THAT WAS ON HIS PROPERTY. WE SPENT, AN IMMENSE AMOUNT OF WASTED TIME FOR THINGS THAT I FEEL LIKE HE KNEW HE COULD HAVE DISCLOSED.

AND THAT MIGHT BE JUST MY HUNCH.

AND, YOU KNOW, WHATEVER EXTRA MONEY HE SPENT ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY PHASE ONE.

AND THEN WE HAD TO DO A SECOND ONE.

SO, I MEAN, HOW MUCH LONGER IS THIS GOING TO DRAG ON IF WE LEFT OR DRIVE AS IS AND TOOK OFF 100 WEST, YOU KNOW, STREET, WHICH WE KNOW WHAT WE'RE GETTING WHEN WE PURCHASE THAT, HOW MUCH LONGER WILL DORA KEEP GOING? WILL IT GO INTO OUR NEXT BUDGET SEASON? BECAUSE IT'S JUST AROUND THE CORNER.

THE MAYOR TO THE COMMISSIONER RING.

I CAN'T ANSWER THAT QUESTION BECAUSE THEY SENT US A PROPOSAL.

WE'RE GOING TO SEND THEM A COUNTER PROPOSAL.

THAT COUNTER PROPOSAL MAY OR MAY NOT BE ACCEPTABLE TO THEM.

AND WE WHEN WE MAY OR MAY NOT REACH CONSENSUS ON, WHAT IS APPROPRIATE.

SO IN THAT, IN THAT NOT REACHING CONSENSUS PORTION.

SO WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO.

WE'RE GOING TO SAY NO TO 100 WEST STREET, BECAUSE I GUARANTEE YOU IT'S NOT GOING TO BE HERE IN SIX MONTHS.

BUT HOW LONG WAS DOOR DRIVE ON THE TABLE? IF I MAY TRY TO ANSWER THAT, I THINK THAT WILL BE SIGNIFICANTLY ADDRESSED WHEN MR. KILLINGSWORTH GIVES US ITERATION ONE, TWO AND THREE OF THE IMPACTS OF EACH OF THE THREE PROJECTS.

ON WHETHER OR NOT WE DO OR DON'T NEED ADDITIONAL FUNDS FROM SOMEWHERE.

COULD BE RESERVES, COULD BE, ANOTHER GRANT FROM THE CITY OF JACKSONVILLE.

WHATEVER. BUT I THINK WE'RE WE'RE DEFICIENT ON THAT INFORMATION TONIGHT TO REALLY HAVE MUCH OF A DISCUSSION.

SO I HEAR YOU, BUT WHEN YOU GET THE INFORMATION, I THINK YOU'LL HAVE CLARITY.

WELL, ANOTHER THING, MR. MAYOR, THAT I JUST WANT TO SAY IS, AS WE GO HOME TONIGHT AND WE GATHER THIS INFORMATION SOLO BECAUSE WE DON'T SPEAK UNLESS WE'RE HERE.

I JUST WANT TO SAY MY PIECE ABOUT THAT TO MY FELLOW COMMISSION COMMISSIONERS, THAT TO CONSIDER THAT I CAN GUARANTEE YOU 100 WEST STREET IS NOT GOING TO BE THERE. WE'RE STILL GOING BACK AND FORTH WITH THIS STORAGE DRIVE SELLER WHO'S BEEN TRYING TO SELL HIS PROPERTY FOR QUITE SOME TIME.

AND, YOU KNOW, POSSIBLY EVEN IF WE DID PULL IT OFF THE TABLE, WE MIGHT STILL BE IN THE SAME POSITION COME NEXT BUDGET SEASON. OKAY, OKAY.

I THINK I THINK ONE THING TO KEEP IN MIND HERE, THIS IS THE INTRODUCTION OF FIRST READING.

[01:30:03]

YEP. OKAY. THIS IS NOT THE FINAL.

WHAT THIS DOES GO THOUGH IS AND YOU CORRECT ME CITY MANAGER..

IS WE GO DOWN THE ROAD AND WE CONTINUE THE INVESTIGATION.

WE CONTINUE TO GATHER DATA.

WE CONTINUE TO LOOK AT THE FINANCIAL RAMIFICATIONS.

YOU'RE GOING TO BRIEF US EXACTLY IN NEXT MEETING WHERE WE STAND FINANCIALLY.

SO ALL THIS DOES IS REALLY A PLACEHOLDER TO CONTINUE THE DISCUSSION, CORRECT? THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY.

SO SO THIS DOESN'T YOU KNOW, WE'RE NOT SPLITTING THE BABY HERE.

I GUESS CAN I SAY NOT TONIGHT? OKAY. YOU DID.

YOU SAID THAT IT'S A NAVY TERM.

YEAH. BUT BUT MY MY POINT IS, YOU, IN MY ESTIMATION, YOU PASS THIS, YOU CONTINUE TO LOOK AT IT.

AND WHEN THE WHEN THE ROAD COMES TO IT, THE FORK, YOU TAKE THE FORK JUST, YOU KNOW, AND I CAN'T I DON'T THINK I CAN SAY IT ANY BETTER.

EACH OF US NEEDS TO REMEMBER THERE'S A REASON FOR TWO READINGS.

OKAY? WE WE MAY GET, OH.

BY THE WAY, WE DIDN'T, DO PUBLIC COMMENT ON THAT.

DONNA. THAT'LL BE NEXT TIME.

OH. I'M SORRY. THAT'S RIGHT.

SO. SO AT THE SECOND READING, WE WILL HAVE PUBLIC COMMENT.

AND WE'LL ALSO HAVE INFORMATION THAT WE DIDN'T HAVE, FOR DISCUSSION TONIGHT.

SO WE REALLY NEED TO REMEMBER THAT YOU CAN SAY NO ON THE SECOND READING, BUT YOU CAN SAY YES IF YOU'RE SATISFIED WITH, YOU KNOW, WE'LL GO WITH.

COMMISSIONER. BUT LET'S NOT FORGET THAT DORA DRIVE IS PART OF AN EXISTING CIP, AND WE'RE JUST BUYING IT EARLY, YOU KNOW, BEFORE WE HAVE THE REST OF THE SYSTEM IN PLACE.

BUT IT'S SOMETHING THAT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO SPEND EITHER NOW OR LATER BECAUSE WE NEED THAT, THAT THE SAFETY VALVE FOR THE, FOR THE, FOR, FOR SUSTAINABILITY.

SURE. ABSOLUTELY.

SO IT'S NOT EXTRA.

IT'S JUST. EARLY.

SO WE, YOU KNOW, WE'VE GOT SOME DECISIONS TO MAKE GOING FORWARD.

THIS IS IMPORTANT THAT WE GET IT RIGHT.

I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO THE NEXT MEETING AND HEARING A LITTLE BIT MORE DETAIL.

AND I THINK WE'LL LEAVE IT AT THAT.

SO, ACTUALLY, RIGHT NOW WE HAVE A MOTION ON THE FLOOR.

WE HAVE A SECOND. IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING? NONE. ALL IN FAVOR SIGNIFY WITH I, I.

THAT'S UNANIMOUS.

THANK YOU. OKAY.

LET'S MOVE TO, CITY ATTORNEY.

YOUR REPORT.

I HAVE NOTHING TO REPORT TODAY, SIR.

OKAY. CITY CLERK, NEITHER DO I.

THANK YOU. OKAY, THEN WE'LL MOVE TO ITEM 12.

[12. CLOSING COMMENTS BY CITY COMMISSIONERS AND CITY MANAGER]

CLOSING COMMENTS, STARTING WITH MR. BOLE. YEAH.

FIRST OF ALL, I WANT TO. I WANT TO THANK RICHARD.

THAT'S A JOB THAT I WOULDN'T WANT.

OKAY? AND I DON'T THINK HE REALLY WANTS IT.

IF YOU KIND OF LOOK AT WHAT HE'S, YOU KNOW, HIS BODY LANGUAGE.

BUT, I APPRECIATE THAT'S A, THAT'S A TOUGH ONE THAT YOU'RE NOT GOING TO GET A RIGHT ANSWER AT.

AND, YOU KNOW, I'VE WATCHED SOME OF YOUR MEETINGS ONLINE, BUT I PERSONALLY APPRECIATE THAT THAT WORK YOU'RE DOING.

WE'RE TALKING ABOUT INFRASTRUCTURE HERE.

AND MAYBE, MAYBE, MAYBE THIS IS A, YOU KNOW, A VIEW FROM THE CITY.

THE INFRASTRUCTURE HAS GOT TO BE HIGH ON THE LIST.

WE VOTED THAT. WE VOTED RESILIENCY.

AND IF YOU JUST WANT AN EXAMPLE OF THAT, GO AND TALK TO YOUR FRIENDS IN NEPTUNE BEACH AND ASK THEM ABOUT THEIR WATER BILL.

YEP. OKAY. THAT THAT KIND OF BRINGS IT HOME.

YOU KNOW WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO HERE AS FAR AS A, YOU KNOW, A LOT OF THESE PROJECTS.

SO IT'S GOT TO BE ON THE TOP OF THE LIST.

THAT'S ALL. THANK YOU.

OKAY. COMMISSIONER KELLY.

YES. I WANT TO ECHO THAT YOUR, THE STAFF COMMITTEE EFFORTS.

YOU KNOW, THIS IS OUR SECOND TRY AT HAVING A STOP COMMITTEE.

AND IN THE BEGINNING, WE WE FELL INTO SOME OF THE SAME TRAPS WE DID THE LAST TIME.

AND SO, THANKS FOR FOR THE CITY MANAGER FOR SORT OF TAKING IT IN HAND AND GIVING YOU SOME DIRECTION.

AND SO I WISH YOU THE BEST OF LUCK, ESPECIALLY WITH THOSE LITTLE PESKY E-BIKES.

THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER.

COMMISSIONER RING. SO NOT TO SAY THE SAME THING OVER AND OVER AGAIN, BUT I DO HAVE TO SAY THANK YOU TO RICHARD FOR STEPPING UP AS THE CHAIR AND REELING IT BACK IN, BILL FOR STEPPING IN AND, BRINGING TO THE COMMITTEE SET PRIORITIES.

AND GRACE IS HERE AS WELL FROM THE, STOP COMMITTEE.

I DON'T THINK I SEE ANYONE ELSE FROM THE STOP COMMITTEE AND ALL THE, COMMITTEE MEMBERS FOR VOLUNTEERING THEIR TIME.

I KNOW IT'S REALLY DIFFICULT, TO GIVE UP YOUR TIME AND TO DIVE INTO THESE ISSUES, BUT I WILL SAY IT'S PROBABLY THE ONE I HEAR THE MOST COMPLAINTS ABOUT.

PARKING SAFETY, WALKABILITY.

BIKEABILITY. SO IT'S A IT'S AN IMPORTANT ONE.

AND I APPRECIATE YOUR DOING IT, THAT YOU, AS COMMISSIONER WATERS MENTIONED, TAKE A HUGE LOAD OFF OF OUR BACKS.

AND I LOOK FORWARD TO SEEING THAT REPORT WHEN YOU SUNSET IN NOVEMBER.

THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER. COMMISSIONER WATERS.

I HAVE NOTHING MORE TO SAY.

ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. I'LL FINISH WITH, I WAS REALLY EXCITED YESTERDAY TO SEE WHAT MANY OF YOU HAVE SEEN WHEN I CAME OUT FOR THE FARMERS

[01:35:07]

MARKET, THAT THE CARS WERE PARKED DOWN BOTH SIDES OF SEMINOLE.

THEY WERE PARKED ON, PLAZA.

YEAH, THEY WERE PARKED IN THE PARKING AREA.

WE WERE JAM PACKED, AND I LOVED IT.

I, I HAVE NO, NO PROBLEM WITH THE FACT THAT WHEN YOU HAVE, EVENTS LIKE THAT, YOU UTILIZE PARKING THAT YOU HAVE THAT'S NOT, YOU KNOW, MARKED OR.

OH, BY THE WAY, PARKING COMMITTEE, YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO TALK ABOUT THAT ONE.

THESE ARE NOT MARKED SPOTS, BUT, IT REALLY JUST SPOKE VOLUMES.

AND AS I WALKED THROUGH THE FARMERS MARKET, I COULD TELL THERE WERE SO MANY MORE, VENDORS THERE, SO MANY MORE TENTS UP.

SO THIS IS A VERY POPULAR, THING HERE IN ATLANTIC BEACH, AND IT SETS OUR COMMUNITY APART.

SO I WAS, REALLY PLEASED TO SEE THAT.

I WANT TO CONCLUDE ON SOMETHING THAT I HOPE, IS NO LONGER THE THE TOPIC DU JOUR, FOR THE REST OF THE YEAR.

AND THAT IS PICKLEBALL, BECAUSE EVERYWHERE I GO, WHENEVER I SPEAK WITH THE OTHER TWO MAYORS AT THE BEACH, INVARIABLY ENDS UP ON PICKLEBALL.

AND WE'VE GOT OUR FOUR NEW COURTS COMING IN.

I JUST WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT AS I, ASSESSED AND MADE MY, VOICE HEARD AND VOTED IN FAVOR OF EXPANDING PICKLEBALL IN ATLANTIC BEACH, I WAS NOT A PICKLEBALL PLAYER.

I HAVE NEVER I HAD NEVER PLAYED PICKLEBALL.

SO I WENT OUT YESTERDAY AND I PLAYED THREE GAMES AT, DONNER PARK, AND I WON TWO OUT OF THREE GAMES.

JUST WANT YOU TO KNOW YOUR MAYOR STILL GOT IT GOING.

SO HE WAS SIX YEARS OLD.

WHO DID YOU PLAY, MAN? YEAH, I PLAYED TWO YOUNG LADIES THAT WERE VERY GOOD.

BUT I HAD A PARTNER MYSELF.

BIG LIGHT CAME, SHINED ON YOU, AND.

OKAY. ANYWAYS, NO FURTHER BUSINESS.

THIS MEETING IS ADJOURNED.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.